[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 1/2] target/arm: Move qmp_query_gic_capabilities
|
From: |
Daniel P . Berrangé |
|
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 1/2] target/arm: Move qmp_query_gic_capabilities() to hw/intc/ |
|
Date: |
Thu, 8 Aug 2024 12:56:53 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.12 (2023-09-09) |
On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:48:39PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 12:32:35PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 Aug 2024 at 12:23, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 08, 2024 at 11:15:17AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > > It's not possible to use KVM with that machine type, so the
> > > > question is a bit moot. (This also indicates that the
> > > > interface is not very helpful -- it purports to tell the
> > > > management layer whether it can use an accelerated in-kernel
> > > > GIC, but because it doesn't specifiy the board type there's
> > > > no way to provide an accurate answer. It would be useful
> > > > to know exactly what libvirt/etc actually use this for...)
> > >
> > > Libvirt uses this exclusively with the arm 'virt' machine type.
> > >
> > > If the user didn't express any GIC preference, then if KVM is in use,
> > > we'll pick the highest GIC version QEMU reports as supported.
> >
> > You can get that without querying QEMU by asking for 'gic-version=max'
> > if you like.
>
> This isn't in the VM startup path. It is when we expand the user
> provided XML config into an ABI stable XML config by filling in
> the blanks left by the user. So we need to actually query the
> values available.
>
> > > If TCG
> > > is in use we'll always pick v2, even if QEMU reports v3 is emulatable
> > > due to the v3 impl lacking MSI controller which we need for PCI-e
> >
> > Our emulated GICv3 supports the ITS which has MSI support, so I'm not
> > sure what forcing GICv2 is getting you here. Looking at the linked
> > RHEL bugzilla bug, I suspect this is an out-of-date policy from before
> > we added the ITS emulation in 2021 (it's present by default
> > in virt-2.8 and later machine types). So that is something that
> > libvirt should update I think.
>
> It looks like it is virt-6.2 or later, and libvirt can probe it
> by looking for existence of the arm-gicv3-its QOM type IIUC.
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/659
With regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
- Re: [RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 1/2] target/arm: Move qmp_query_gic_capabilities() to hw/intc/, (continued)
- Re: [RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 1/2] target/arm: Move qmp_query_gic_capabilities() to hw/intc/, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/08/07
- Re: [RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 1/2] target/arm: Move qmp_query_gic_capabilities() to hw/intc/, Peter Maydell, 2024/08/07
- Re: [RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 1/2] target/arm: Move qmp_query_gic_capabilities() to hw/intc/, Markus Armbruster, 2024/08/08
- Re: [RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 1/2] target/arm: Move qmp_query_gic_capabilities() to hw/intc/, Peter Maydell, 2024/08/08
- Re: [RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 1/2] target/arm: Move qmp_query_gic_capabilities() to hw/intc/, Markus Armbruster, 2024/08/08
- Re: [RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 1/2] target/arm: Move qmp_query_gic_capabilities() to hw/intc/, Peter Maydell, 2024/08/08
- Re: [RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 1/2] target/arm: Move qmp_query_gic_capabilities() to hw/intc/, Markus Armbruster, 2024/08/08
- Re: [RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 1/2] target/arm: Move qmp_query_gic_capabilities() to hw/intc/, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2024/08/08
- Re: [RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 1/2] target/arm: Move qmp_query_gic_capabilities() to hw/intc/, Peter Maydell, 2024/08/08
- Re: [RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 1/2] target/arm: Move qmp_query_gic_capabilities() to hw/intc/, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2024/08/08
- Re: [RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 1/2] target/arm: Move qmp_query_gic_capabilities() to hw/intc/,
Daniel P . Berrangé <=
- Re: [RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 1/2] target/arm: Move qmp_query_gic_capabilities() to hw/intc/, Peter Maydell, 2024/08/08
Re: [RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 1/2] target/arm: Move qmp_query_gic_capabilities() to hw/intc/, Markus Armbruster, 2024/08/07
[RFC PATCH-for-9.1? 2/2] hw/intc/arm_gic: Only provide query-gic-capabilities when GIC built-in, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2024/08/06