[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v5 11/15] target/riscv: mmu changes for zicfiss shadow stack
|
From: |
Deepak Gupta |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v5 11/15] target/riscv: mmu changes for zicfiss shadow stack protection |
|
Date: |
Tue, 20 Aug 2024 00:35:24 -0700 |
On Mon, Aug 19, 2024 at 05:01:25PM -0700, Deepak Gupta wrote:
zicfiss protects shadow stack using new page table encodings PTE.W=0,
PTE.R=0 and PTE.X=0. This encoding is reserved if zicfiss is not
implemented or if shadow stack are not enabled.
Loads on shadow stack memory are allowed while stores to shadow stack
memory leads to access faults. Shadow stack accesses to RO memory
leads to store page fault.
To implement special nature of shadow stack memory where only selected
stores (shadow stack stores from sspush) have to be allowed while rest
of regular stores disallowed, new MMU TLB index is created for shadow
stack.
Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
Suggested-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
@@ -1406,6 +1431,11 @@ bool riscv_cpu_tlb_fill(CPUState *cs, vaddr address, int
size,
qemu_log_mask(CPU_LOG_MMU, "%s ad %" VADDR_PRIx " rw %d mmu_idx %d\n",
__func__, address, access_type, mmu_idx);
+ /* If shadow stack instruction initiated this access, treat it as store */
+ if (mmu_idx & MMU_IDX_SS_WRITE) {
+ access_type = MMU_DATA_STORE;
+ }
+
I think I forgot to address this. Do you still want me to fix this up like you
had suggested?
IIRC, you mentioned to use TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS=2. Honestly I don't
know
what it means and how its used. Based on git grep and some readup, are you
expecting something
along the below lines?
"""
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.h b/target/riscv/cpu.h
index fee31b8037..dfd2efa941 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu.h
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu.h
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ typedef struct CPUArchState CPURISCVState;
* RISC-V-specific extra insn start words:
* 1: Original instruction opcode
*/
-#define TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS 1
+#define TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS 2
#define RV(x) ((target_ulong)1 << (x - 'A'))
diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
index f74a1216b1..b266177e46 100644
--- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
+++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
@@ -1271,6 +1271,11 @@ static void raise_mmu_exception(CPURISCVState *env,
target_ulong address,
{
CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env);
+ if (!pmp_violation &&
+ tcg_ctx->gen_insn_data[TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS-1] & 1) {
+ tcg_ctx->gen_insn_data[TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS-1] &= ~1;
+ access_type = MMU_DATA_STORE;
+ }
+
switch (access_type) {
case MMU_INST_FETCH:
if (pmp_violation) {
@@ -1433,7 +1438,7 @@ bool riscv_cpu_tlb_fill(CPUState *cs, vaddr address, int
size,
/* If shadow stack instruction initiated this access, treat it as store */
if (mmu_idx & MMU_IDX_SS_WRITE) {
- access_type = MMU_DATA_STORE;
+ tcg_ctx->gen_insn_data[TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS-1] |= 1;
}
pmu_tlb_fill_incr_ctr(cpu, access_type);
@@ -1529,6 +1534,7 @@ bool riscv_cpu_tlb_fill(CPUState *cs, vaddr address, int
size,
if (ret == TRANSLATE_SUCCESS) {
tlb_set_page(cs, address & ~(tlb_size - 1), pa & ~(tlb_size - 1),
prot, mmu_idx, tlb_size);
+ tcg_ctx->gen_insn_data[TARGET_INSN_START_EXTRA_WORDS-1] &= ~1;
return true;
} else if (probe) {
"""
pmu_tlb_fill_incr_ctr(cpu, access_type);
if (two_stage_lookup) {
/* Two stage lookup */
diff --git a/target/riscv/internals.h b/target/riscv/internals.h
index 0ac17bc5ad..ddbdee885b 100644
--- a/target/riscv/internals.h
+++ b/target/riscv/internals.h
@@ -30,12 +30,15 @@
* - U+2STAGE 0b100
* - S+2STAGE 0b101
* - S+SUM+2STAGE 0b110
+ * - Shadow stack+U 0b1000
+ * - Shadow stack+S 0b1001
*/
#define MMUIdx_U 0
#define MMUIdx_S 1
#define MMUIdx_S_SUM 2
#define MMUIdx_M 3
#define MMU_2STAGE_BIT (1 << 2)
+#define MMU_IDX_SS_WRITE (1 << 3)
static inline int mmuidx_priv(int mmu_idx)
{
--
2.44.0
- Re: [PATCH v5 02/15] target/riscv: Introduce elp state and enabling controls for zicfilp, (continued)
- [PATCH v5 07/15] disas/riscv: enable `lpad` disassembly, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
- [PATCH v5 14/15] disas/riscv: enable disassembly for zicfiss instructions, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
- [PATCH v5 06/15] target/riscv: zicfilp `lpad` impl and branch tracking, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
- [PATCH v5 05/15] target/riscv: tracking indirect branches (fcfi) for zicfilp, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
- [PATCH v5 10/15] target/riscv: tb flag for shadow stack instructions, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
- [PATCH v5 15/15] disas/riscv: enable disassembly for compressed sspush/sspopchk, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
- [PATCH v5 11/15] target/riscv: mmu changes for zicfiss shadow stack protection, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
- Re: [PATCH v5 11/15] target/riscv: mmu changes for zicfiss shadow stack protection,
Deepak Gupta <=
[PATCH v5 08/15] target/riscv: Add zicfiss extension, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
[PATCH v5 12/15] target/riscv: implement zicfiss instructions, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19
[PATCH v5 09/15] target/riscv: introduce ssp and enabling controls for zicfiss, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/19