qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] ppc: fixed incorrect name filed in vmstate_tlbemb_entry


From: Arman Nabiev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc: fixed incorrect name filed in vmstate_tlbemb_entry
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 21:55:52 +0300

In my example in https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2522 the .needed function returns true for vmstate_tlbemb, but not for vmstate_tlb6xx. I tried to do some tests without fixing the typo. When I changed the .fields in the two structures to the same value so that the size of the data they stored matched, everything worked. I also changed the order of vmstate_tlb6xx and vmstate_tlbemb in the subsections field of vmstate_ppc_cpu, everything worked as well.
According to https://www.qemu.org/docs/master/devel/migration/main.html#:~:text=On%20the%20receiving%20side%2C%20if,that%20didn%E2%80%99t%20send%20the%20subsection and on my own tests I think the problem is that when reading saved data, qemu uses the device name to determine an object that extracts a certain size of data. Since the names are the same for vmstate_tlb6xx and vmstate_tlbemb, it uses the functions for the first one due to a certain order, which leads to an error, since the data from the second one was saved.

On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 at 18:45, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Aug 2024 at 15:08, Physics Набиев <nabiev.arman13@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry for not providing enough argumentation for my patch. I found a configuration where this error occurs. Please take a look at https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/2522.

Hmm. I don't understand why fixing this field name would
fix record-and-replay, because I would have thought that
all that should matter is that the name that we write out
in the record matches the one we read in in the replay...

-- PMM

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]