[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v9 06/17] target/riscv: zicfilp `lpad` impl and branch tracki
|
From: |
Alistair Francis |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v9 06/17] target/riscv: zicfilp `lpad` impl and branch tracking |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Aug 2024 14:14:07 +1000 |
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 1:33 AM Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com> wrote:
>
> Implements setting lp expected when `jalr` is encountered and implements
> `lpad` instruction of zicfilp. `lpad` instruction is taken out of
> auipc x0, <imm_20>. This is an existing HINTNOP space. If `lpad` is
> target of an indirect branch, cpu checks for 20 bit value in x7 upper
> with 20 bit value embedded in `lpad`. If they don't match, cpu raises a
> sw check exception with tval = 2.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>
> Co-developed-by: Jim Shu <jim.shu@sifive.com>
> Co-developed-by: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@sifive.com>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Alistair
> ---
> target/riscv/cpu_user.h | 1 +
> target/riscv/insn32.decode | 5 ++-
> target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvi.c.inc | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_user.h b/target/riscv/cpu_user.h
> index 02afad608b..e6927ff847 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_user.h
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_user.h
> @@ -15,5 +15,6 @@
> #define xA6 16
> #define xA7 17 /* syscall number for RVI ABI */
> #define xT0 5 /* syscall number for RVE ABI */
> +#define xT2 7
>
> #endif
> diff --git a/target/riscv/insn32.decode b/target/riscv/insn32.decode
> index c45b8fa1d8..27108b992b 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/insn32.decode
> +++ b/target/riscv/insn32.decode
> @@ -123,7 +123,10 @@ sfence_vm 0001000 00100 ..... 000 00000 1110011
> @sfence_vm
>
> # *** RV32I Base Instruction Set ***
> lui .................... ..... 0110111 @u
> -auipc .................... ..... 0010111 @u
> +{
> + lpad label:20 00000 0010111
> + auipc .................... ..... 0010111 @u
> +}
> jal .................... ..... 1101111 @j
> jalr ............ ..... 000 ..... 1100111 @i
> beq ....... ..... ..... 000 ..... 1100011 @b
> diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvi.c.inc
> b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvi.c.inc
> index 98e3806d5e..b427f3a939 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvi.c.inc
> +++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvi.c.inc
> @@ -36,6 +36,49 @@ static bool trans_lui(DisasContext *ctx, arg_lui *a)
> return true;
> }
>
> +static bool trans_lpad(DisasContext *ctx, arg_lpad *a)
> +{
> + /*
> + * fcfi_lp_expected can set only if fcfi was eanbled.
> + * translate further only if fcfi_lp_expected set.
> + * lpad comes from NOP space anyways, so return true if
> + * fcfi_lp_expected is false.
> + */
> + if (!ctx->fcfi_lp_expected) {
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + ctx->fcfi_lp_expected = false;
> + if ((ctx->base.pc_next) & 0x3) {
> + /*
> + * misaligned, according to spec we should raise sw check exception
> + */
> + tcg_gen_st_tl(tcg_constant_tl(RISCV_EXCP_SW_CHECK_FCFI_TVAL),
> + tcg_env, offsetof(CPURISCVState, sw_check_code));
> + gen_helper_raise_exception(tcg_env,
> + tcg_constant_i32(RISCV_EXCP_SW_CHECK));
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + /* per spec, label check performed only when embedded label non-zero */
> + if (a->label != 0) {
> + TCGLabel *skip = gen_new_label();
> + TCGv tmp = tcg_temp_new();
> + tcg_gen_extract_tl(tmp, get_gpr(ctx, xT2, EXT_NONE), 12, 20);
> + tcg_gen_brcondi_tl(TCG_COND_EQ, tmp, a->label, skip);
> + tcg_gen_st_tl(tcg_constant_tl(RISCV_EXCP_SW_CHECK_FCFI_TVAL),
> + tcg_env, offsetof(CPURISCVState, sw_check_code));
> + gen_helper_raise_exception(tcg_env,
> + tcg_constant_i32(RISCV_EXCP_SW_CHECK));
> + gen_set_label(skip);
> + }
> +
> + tcg_gen_st8_tl(tcg_constant_tl(0), tcg_env,
> + offsetof(CPURISCVState, elp));
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> static bool trans_auipc(DisasContext *ctx, arg_auipc *a)
> {
> TCGv target_pc = dest_gpr(ctx, a->rd);
> @@ -75,6 +118,18 @@ static bool trans_jalr(DisasContext *ctx, arg_jalr *a)
> gen_set_gpr(ctx, a->rd, succ_pc);
>
> tcg_gen_mov_tl(cpu_pc, target_pc);
> + if (ctx->fcfi_enabled) {
> + /*
> + * return from functions (i.e. rs1 == xRA || rs1 == xT0) are not
> + * tracked. zicfilp introduces sw guarded branch as well. sw guarded
> + * branch are not tracked. rs1 == xT2 is a sw guarded branch.
> + */
> + if (a->rs1 != xRA && a->rs1 != xT0 && a->rs1 != xT2) {
> + tcg_gen_st8_tl(tcg_constant_tl(1),
> + tcg_env, offsetof(CPURISCVState, elp));
> + }
> + }
> +
> lookup_and_goto_ptr(ctx);
>
> if (misaligned) {
> --
> 2.44.0
>
>
- [PATCH v9 05/17] target/riscv: tracking indirect branches (fcfi) for zicfilp, (continued)
- [PATCH v9 05/17] target/riscv: tracking indirect branches (fcfi) for zicfilp, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/26
- [PATCH v9 04/17] target/riscv: additional code information for sw check, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/26
- [PATCH v9 07/17] disas/riscv: enable `lpad` disassembly, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/26
- [PATCH v9 09/17] target/riscv: introduce ssp and enabling controls for zicfiss, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/26
- [PATCH v9 12/17] target/riscv: AMO operations always raise store/AMO fault, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/26
- [PATCH v9 06/17] target/riscv: zicfilp `lpad` impl and branch tracking, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/26
- Re: [PATCH v9 06/17] target/riscv: zicfilp `lpad` impl and branch tracking,
Alistair Francis <=
- [PATCH v9 10/17] target/riscv: tb flag for shadow stack instructions, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/26
- [PATCH v9 16/17] disas/riscv: enable disassembly for zicfiss instructions, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/26
- [PATCH v9 13/17] target/riscv: update `decode_save_opc` to store extra word2, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/26
- [PATCH v9 14/17] target/riscv: implement zicfiss instructions, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/26
- [PATCH v9 08/17] target/riscv: Add zicfiss extension, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/26
- [PATCH v9 11/17] target/riscv: mmu changes for zicfiss shadow stack protection, Deepak Gupta, 2024/08/26