[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2] aspeed: Deprecate the tacoma-bmc machine
|
From: |
Guenter Roeck |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2] aspeed: Deprecate the tacoma-bmc machine |
|
Date: |
Fri, 30 Aug 2024 13:11:14 -0700 |
On Fri, Aug 30, 2024 at 10:09:25AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> > > > I solved the problem by adding support for IBM Bonnell (which
> > > > instantiates
> > > > the TPM chip through its devicetree file, similar to tacoma-bmc) to my
> > > > local
> > > > copy of qemu.
> > >
> > > Hmm, did you copy the rainier-bmc machine definition ?
> > >
> > For aspeed_machine_bonnell_class_init(), pretty much yes, since I don't know
> > the actual hardware. For I2C initialization I used the devicetree file.
> > You can find the patch in the master-local or v9.1.0-local branches
> > of my qemu clone at https://github.com/groeck/qemu if you are interested.
>
> Oh nice ! Let's merge the IBM Bonnell machine. We can ask IBM to help fixing
> the definitions (strapping). Enabling the PCA9554 is good to have too.
>
Sure, let me do that.
> Why are you keeping the tmp105 changes ? LGTM. Same for the new tmp models,
> they could be upstreamed.
>
Ok, I'll work on that.
Thanks,
Guenter