[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
SNP: qemu upstream vs AMD fork on kernel 6.11
From: |
Arvid Picciani |
Subject: |
SNP: qemu upstream vs AMD fork on kernel 6.11 |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Aug 2024 15:26:14 +0200 |
Hi,
with linux 6.11 it looks like kvm SNP host api is finally there.
However, current qemu upstream appears to be tested against a much
older kernel by redhat (according to the libvirt IRC its via coconut
svsm), while the current head of the amd fork on github works just
fine with 6.11.
Am i missing something or is qemu upstream just not done?
there's also this old patch missing to enable virtiofsd
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2022-01/msg03456.html
i would rebase that and send it again, but current main is broken on
6.11, so wondering where qemu is heading.
thanks
--
https://kraudcloud.com/
devguard GmbH, Berlin, Geschäftsführer: Arvid E Picciani
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg (Berlin) HRB 195184 B
- SNP: qemu upstream vs AMD fork on kernel 6.11,
Arvid Picciani <=
- Re: SNP: qemu upstream vs AMD fork on kernel 6.11, Paolo Bonzini, 2024/08/05
- RE: SNP: qemu upstream vs AMD fork on kernel 6.11, Roth, Michael, 2024/08/05
- Re: SNP: qemu upstream vs AMD fork on kernel 6.11, Arvid Picciani, 2024/08/05
- Re: SNP: qemu upstream vs AMD fork on kernel 6.11, Michael Roth, 2024/08/05
- Re: SNP: qemu upstream vs AMD fork on kernel 6.11, Arvid Picciani, 2024/08/05
- Re: SNP: qemu upstream vs AMD fork on kernel 6.11, Michael Roth, 2024/08/05
- Re: SNP: qemu upstream vs AMD fork on kernel 6.11, Jakob Bohm, 2024/08/06