qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] ppc: ensure we update the decrem


From: Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] ppc: ensure we update the decrementer value during migration
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 18:11:23 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

On 13/09/17 08:12, David Gibson wrote:

> This is subtly incorrect.  It sets the DECR on load to exactly the
> value that was saved.  That effectively means that the DECR is frozen
> for the migration downtime, which probably isn't what we want.
> 
> Instead we need to save the DECR as an offset from the timebase, and
> restore it relative to the (downtime adjusted) timebase on the
> destination.
> 
> The complication with that is that the timebase is generally migrated
> at the machine level, not the cpu level: the timebase is generally
> synchronized between cpus in the machine, and migrating it at the
> individual cpu could break that.  Which means we probably need a
> machine level hook to handle the decrementer too, even though it
> logically *is* per-cpu, because otherwise we'll be trying to restore
> it before the timebase is restored.

I know that we discussed this in-depth last year, however I was working
along the lines that Laurent's patch fixed this along the lines of our
previous discussion:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-02/msg00338.html (and
indeed Laurent's analysis at
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-02/msg01489.html).

However looking again at the this patch in the context you mentioned
above, I'm starting to wonder if the right solution now is for the
machine init function for g3beige/mac99 to do the same as spapr, e.g.
add cpu_ppc_clock_vm_state_change() as a vm_change_state_handler and
then add VMSTATE_PPC_TIMEBASE_V from the machine PPCTimeBase into my new
subsection?

Laurent, do you think that your state change handler would work
correctly in this way?


ATB,

Mark.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]