[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/3] target/ppc/kvm: don't pass cpu to kvm_get_smm
From: |
Cédric Le Goater |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 1/3] target/ppc/kvm: don't pass cpu to kvm_get_smmu_info() |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jun 2018 13:56:58 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2 |
On 06/28/2018 12:14 PM, Greg Kurz wrote:
> In a future patch the machine code will need to retrieve the MMU
> information from KVM during machine initialization before the CPUs
> are created.
>
> Actually, KVM_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO is a VM class ioctl, and thus, it only
> needs the kvm_state global variable to be set. The fallback code only
> needs informations from the machine's CPU model class.
>
> So this patch basically drops the CPU argument to kvm_get_smmu_info()
> and kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(). The kvm_state and current_machine
> globals are used instead to reach out to KVM and CPU model details
> respectively.
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <address@hidden>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
one question below,
Thanks,
C.
> ---
> target/ppc/kvm.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> target/ppc/mmu-hash64.h | 8 +++++++-
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/ppc/kvm.c b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> index 4df4ff6cbff2..9fae89ff8175 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/ppc/kvm.c
> @@ -248,11 +248,12 @@ static int kvm_booke206_tlb_init(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>
>
> #if defined(TARGET_PPC64)
> -static void kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> - struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info *info)
> +static void kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info *info)
> {
> - CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
> - CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> + const PowerPCCPUClass *pcc;
> +
> + assert(current_machine != NULL);
can that ever happen ?
> + pcc = POWERPC_CPU_CLASS(object_class_by_name(current_machine->cpu_type));
>
> memset(info, 0, sizeof(*info));
>
> @@ -278,7 +279,7 @@ static void kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> * implements KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO and thus doesn't hit
> * this fallback.
> */
> - if (kvmppc_is_pr(cs->kvm_state)) {
> + if (kvmppc_is_pr(kvm_state)) {
> /* No flags */
> info->flags = 0;
> info->slb_size = 64;
> @@ -300,12 +301,12 @@ static void kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> /* HV KVM has backing store size restrictions */
> info->flags = KVM_PPC_PAGE_SIZES_REAL;
>
> - if (ppc_hash64_has(cpu, PPC_HASH64_1TSEG)) {
> + if (hash64_opts_has(pcc->hash64_opts, PPC_HASH64_1TSEG)) {
> info->flags |= KVM_PPC_1T_SEGMENTS;
> }
>
> - if (env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_06 ||
> - env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_07) {
> + if (pcc->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_06 ||
> + pcc->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_07) {
> info->slb_size = 32;
> } else {
> info->slb_size = 64;
> @@ -319,8 +320,8 @@ static void kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> i++;
>
> /* 64K on MMU 2.06 and later */
> - if (env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_06 ||
> - env->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_07) {
> + if (pcc->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_06 ||
> + pcc->mmu_model == POWERPC_MMU_2_07) {
> info->sps[i].page_shift = 16;
> info->sps[i].slb_enc = 0x110;
> info->sps[i].enc[0].page_shift = 16;
> @@ -336,19 +337,18 @@ static void kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> }
> }
>
> -static void kvm_get_smmu_info(PowerPCCPU *cpu, struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info
> *info)
> +static void kvm_get_smmu_info(struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info *info)
> {
> - CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
> int ret;
>
> - if (kvm_check_extension(cs->kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO)) {
> - ret = kvm_vm_ioctl(cs->kvm_state, KVM_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO, info);
> + if (kvm_check_extension(kvm_state, KVM_CAP_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO)) {
> + ret = kvm_vm_ioctl(kvm_state, KVM_PPC_GET_SMMU_INFO, info);
> if (ret == 0) {
> return;
> }
> }
>
> - kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(cpu, info);
> + kvm_get_fallback_smmu_info(info);
> }
>
> struct ppc_radix_page_info *kvm_get_radix_page_info(void)
> @@ -408,14 +408,13 @@ target_ulong kvmppc_configure_v3_mmu(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
>
> bool kvmppc_hpt_needs_host_contiguous_pages(void)
> {
> - PowerPCCPU *cpu = POWERPC_CPU(first_cpu);
> static struct kvm_ppc_smmu_info smmu_info;
>
> if (!kvm_enabled()) {
> return false;
> }
>
> - kvm_get_smmu_info(cpu, &smmu_info);
> + kvm_get_smmu_info(&smmu_info);
> return !!(smmu_info.flags & KVM_PPC_PAGE_SIZES_REAL);
> }
>
> @@ -429,7 +428,7 @@ void kvm_check_mmu(PowerPCCPU *cpu, Error **errp)
> return;
> }
>
> - kvm_get_smmu_info(cpu, &smmu_info);
> + kvm_get_smmu_info(&smmu_info);
>
> if (ppc_hash64_has(cpu, PPC_HASH64_1TSEG)
> && !(smmu_info.flags & KVM_PPC_1T_SEGMENTS)) {
> @@ -2168,7 +2167,7 @@ uint64_t kvmppc_rma_size(uint64_t current_size,
> unsigned int hash_shift)
>
> /* Find the largest hardware supported page size that's less than
> * or equal to the (logical) backing page size of guest RAM */
> - kvm_get_smmu_info(POWERPC_CPU(first_cpu), &info);
> + kvm_get_smmu_info(&info);
> rampagesize = qemu_getrampagesize();
> best_page_shift = 0;
>
> diff --git a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.h b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.h
> index f11efc9cbc1f..00a249f26bc3 100644
> --- a/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.h
> +++ b/target/ppc/mmu-hash64.h
> @@ -169,9 +169,15 @@ struct PPCHash64Options {
> extern const PPCHash64Options ppc_hash64_opts_basic;
> extern const PPCHash64Options ppc_hash64_opts_POWER7;
>
> +static inline bool hash64_opts_has(const PPCHash64Options *opts,
> + unsigned feature)
> +{
> + return !!(opts->flags & feature);
> +}
> +
> static inline bool ppc_hash64_has(PowerPCCPU *cpu, unsigned feature)
> {
> - return !!(cpu->hash64_opts->flags & feature);
> + return hash64_opts_has(cpu->hash64_opts, feature);
> }
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_USER_ONLY */
>