[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 18/27] ppc/pnv: add a LPC Controller model for POW
From: |
Cédric Le Goater |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 18/27] ppc/pnv: add a LPC Controller model for POWER9 |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Mar 2019 08:07:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 |
On 3/7/19 5:18 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 09:50:23AM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> The LPC Controller on POWER9 is very similar to the one found on
>> POWER8 but accesses are now done via on MMIOs, without the XSCOM and
>> ECCB logic. The device tree is populated differently so we add a
>> specific POWER9 routine for the purpose.
>>
>> SerIRQ routing is yet to be done.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> include/hw/ppc/pnv.h | 4 +
>> include/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.h | 10 ++
>> hw/ppc/pnv.c | 29 +++++-
>> hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c | 200 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
>> index 57d0337219be..2d68aabc212f 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
>> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ typedef struct Pnv9Chip {
>> /*< public >*/
>> PnvXive xive;
>> PnvPsi psi;
>> + PnvLpcController lpc;
>> } Pnv9Chip;
>>
>> typedef struct PnvChipClass {
>> @@ -232,6 +233,9 @@ void pnv_bmc_powerdown(IPMIBmc *bmc);
>> #define PNV9_XIVE_PC_SIZE 0x0000001000000000ull
>> #define PNV9_XIVE_PC_BASE(chip) PNV9_CHIP_BASE(chip,
>> 0x0006018000000000ull)
>>
>> +#define PNV9_LPCM_SIZE 0x0000000100000000ull
>> +#define PNV9_LPCM_BASE(chip) PNV9_CHIP_BASE(chip,
>> 0x0006030000000000ull)
>> +
>> #define PNV9_PSIHB_SIZE 0x0000000000100000ull
>> #define PNV9_PSIHB_BASE(chip) PNV9_CHIP_BASE(chip,
>> 0x0006030203000000ull)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.h
>> index 242baecdcb93..24fe23f0f63b 100644
>> --- a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.h
>> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.h
>> @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@
>> #define PNV8_LPC(obj) \
>> OBJECT_CHECK(PnvLpc, (obj), TYPE_PNV8_LPC)
>>
>> +#define TYPE_PNV9_LPC TYPE_PNV_LPC "-POWER9"
>> +#define PNV9_LPC(obj) \
>> + OBJECT_CHECK(PnvLpc, (obj), TYPE_PNV9_LPC)
>> +
>> typedef struct PnvLpcController {
>> DeviceState parent;
>>
>> @@ -86,6 +90,12 @@ typedef struct PnvLpcClass {
>> DeviceRealize parent_realize;
>> } PnvLpcClass;
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Old compilers error on typdef forward declarations. Keep them happy.
>> + */
>> +struct PnvChip;
>> +
>> ISABus *pnv_lpc_isa_create(PnvLpcController *lpc, bool use_cpld, Error
>> **errp);
>> +int pnv_dt_lpc(struct PnvChip *chip, void *fdt, int root_offset);
>>
>> #endif /* _PPC_PNV_LPC_H */
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>> index 7176e1b68d0e..895be470af67 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
>> @@ -306,6 +306,8 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_dt_populate(PnvChip *chip,
>> void *fdt)
>> if (chip->ram_size) {
>> pnv_dt_memory(fdt, chip->chip_id, chip->ram_start, chip->ram_size);
>> }
>> +
>> + pnv_dt_lpc(chip, fdt, 0);
>> }
>>
>> static void pnv_dt_rtc(ISADevice *d, void *fdt, int lpc_off)
>> @@ -422,8 +424,14 @@ static int pnv_chip_isa_offset(PnvChip *chip, void *fdt)
>> char *name;
>> int offset;
>>
>> - name = g_strdup_printf("/address@hidden" PRIx64 "/address@hidden",
>> - (uint64_t) PNV_XSCOM_BASE(chip),
>> PNV_XSCOM_LPC_BASE);
>> + if (pnv_chip_is_power9(chip)) {
>
> Again explicit chip type checks aren't very pretty. Better to
> redirect through a method. Or, better, call into the common ISA DT
> code from chip specific code passing the offset, rather than calling
> out again to get it.
I will an ISA DT nodename under PnvChip. The name can be computed
at realize time.
>
>> + name = g_strdup_printf("/address@hidden" PRIx64 "/address@hidden",
>> + (uint64_t) PNV9_LPCM_BASE(chip));
>> + } else {
>> + name = g_strdup_printf("/address@hidden" PRIx64 "/address@hidden",
>> + (uint64_t) PNV_XSCOM_BASE(chip),
>> + PNV_XSCOM_LPC_BASE);
>> + }
>> offset = fdt_path_offset(fdt, name);
>> g_free(name);
>> return offset;
>> @@ -559,7 +567,8 @@ static ISABus *pnv_chip_power8nvl_isa_create(PnvChip
>> *chip, Error **errp)
>>
>> static ISABus *pnv_chip_power9_isa_create(PnvChip *chip, Error **errp)
>> {
>> - return NULL;
>> + Pnv9Chip *chip9 = PNV9_CHIP(chip);
>> + return pnv_lpc_isa_create(&chip9->lpc, false, errp);
>> }
>>
>> static ISABus *pnv_isa_create(PnvChip *chip, Error **errp)
>> @@ -954,6 +963,11 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_instance_init(Object *obj)
>> TYPE_PNV9_PSI, &error_abort, NULL);
>> object_property_add_const_link(OBJECT(&chip9->psi), "chip", obj,
>> &error_abort);
>> +
>> + object_initialize_child(obj, "lpc", &chip9->lpc, sizeof(chip9->lpc),
>> + TYPE_PNV9_LPC, &error_abort, NULL);
>> + object_property_add_const_link(OBJECT(&chip9->lpc), "psi",
>> + OBJECT(&chip9->psi), &error_abort);
>> }
>>
>> static void pnv_chip_power9_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>> @@ -997,6 +1011,15 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_realize(DeviceState *dev,
>> Error **errp)
>> }
>> pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, PNV9_XSCOM_PSIHB_BASE,
>> &chip9->psi.xscom_regs);
>> +
>> + /* LPC */
>> + object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&chip9->lpc), true, "realized",
>> &local_err);
>> + if (local_err) {
>> + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), PNV9_LPCM_BASE(chip),
>> + &chip9->lpc.xscom_regs);
>> }
>>
>> static void pnv_chip_power9_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c
>> index 3c509a30a0af..6df694e0abc1 100644
>> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c
>> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_lpc.c
>> @@ -118,6 +118,100 @@ static int pnv_lpc_dt_xscom(PnvXScomInterface *dev,
>> void *fdt, int xscom_offset)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +/* POWER9 only */
>> +int pnv_dt_lpc(PnvChip *chip, void *fdt, int root_offset)
>> +{
>> + const char compat[] = "ibm,power9-lpcm-opb\0simple-bus";
>> + const char lpc_compat[] = "ibm,power9-lpc\0ibm,lpc";
>> + char *name;
>> + int offset, lpcm_offset;
>> + uint64_t lpcm_addr = PNV9_LPCM_BASE(chip);
>> + uint32_t opb_ranges[8] = { 0,
>> + cpu_to_be32(lpcm_addr >> 32),
>> + cpu_to_be32((uint32_t)lpcm_addr),
>> + cpu_to_be32(PNV9_LPCM_SIZE / 2),
>> + cpu_to_be32(PNV9_LPCM_SIZE / 2),
>> + cpu_to_be32(lpcm_addr >> 32),
>> + cpu_to_be32(PNV9_LPCM_SIZE / 2),
>> + cpu_to_be32(PNV9_LPCM_SIZE / 2),
>> + };
>> + uint32_t opb_reg[4] = { cpu_to_be32(lpcm_addr >> 32),
>> + cpu_to_be32((uint32_t)lpcm_addr),
>> + cpu_to_be32(PNV9_LPCM_SIZE >> 32),
>> + cpu_to_be32((uint32_t)PNV9_LPCM_SIZE),
>> + };
>> + uint32_t reg[2];
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * OPB bus
>> + */
>> + name = g_strdup_printf("address@hidden"PRIx64, lpcm_addr);
>> + lpcm_offset = fdt_add_subnode(fdt, root_offset, name);
>> + _FDT(lpcm_offset);
>> + g_free(name);
>> +
>> + _FDT((fdt_setprop(fdt, lpcm_offset, "reg", opb_reg, sizeof(opb_reg))));
>> + _FDT((fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, lpcm_offset, "#address-cells", 1)));
>> + _FDT((fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, lpcm_offset, "#size-cells", 1)));
>> + _FDT((fdt_setprop(fdt, lpcm_offset, "compatible", compat,
>> sizeof(compat))));
>> + _FDT((fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, lpcm_offset, "ibm,chip-id",
>> chip->chip_id)));
>> + _FDT((fdt_setprop(fdt, lpcm_offset, "ranges", opb_ranges,
>> + sizeof(opb_ranges))));
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * OPB Master registers
>> + */
>> + name = g_strdup_printf("address@hidden", LPC_OPB_REGS_OPB_ADDR);
>> + offset = fdt_add_subnode(fdt, lpcm_offset, name);
>> + _FDT(offset);
>> + g_free(name);
>> +
>> + reg[0] = cpu_to_be32(LPC_OPB_REGS_OPB_ADDR);
>> + reg[1] = cpu_to_be32(LPC_OPB_REGS_OPB_SIZE);
>> + _FDT((fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "reg", reg, sizeof(reg))));
>> + _FDT((fdt_setprop_string(fdt, offset, "compatible",
>> + "ibm,power9-lpcm-opb-master")));
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * OPB arbitrer registers
>> + */
>> + name = g_strdup_printf("address@hidden", LPC_OPB_REGS_OPBA_ADDR);
>> + offset = fdt_add_subnode(fdt, lpcm_offset, name);
>> + _FDT(offset);
>> + g_free(name);
>> +
>> + reg[0] = cpu_to_be32(LPC_OPB_REGS_OPBA_ADDR);
>> + reg[1] = cpu_to_be32(LPC_OPB_REGS_OPBA_SIZE);
>> + _FDT((fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "reg", reg, sizeof(reg))));
>> + _FDT((fdt_setprop_string(fdt, offset, "compatible",
>> + "ibm,power9-lpcm-opb-arbiter")));
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * LPC Host Controller registers
>> + */
>> + name = g_strdup_printf("address@hidden", LPC_HC_REGS_OPB_ADDR);
>> + offset = fdt_add_subnode(fdt, lpcm_offset, name);
>> + _FDT(offset);
>> + g_free(name);
>> +
>> + reg[0] = cpu_to_be32(LPC_HC_REGS_OPB_ADDR);
>> + reg[1] = cpu_to_be32(LPC_HC_REGS_OPB_SIZE);
>> + _FDT((fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "reg", reg, sizeof(reg))));
>> + _FDT((fdt_setprop_string(fdt, offset, "compatible",
>> + "ibm,power9-lpc-controller")));
>> +
>> + name = g_strdup_printf("address@hidden");
>> + offset = fdt_add_subnode(fdt, lpcm_offset, name);
>> + _FDT(offset);
>> + g_free(name);
>> + _FDT((fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, offset, "#address-cells", 2)));
>> + _FDT((fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, offset, "#size-cells", 1)));
>> + _FDT((fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "compatible", lpc_compat,
>> + sizeof(lpc_compat))));
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * These read/write handlers of the OPB address space should be common
>> * with the P9 LPC Controller which uses direct MMIOs.
>> @@ -242,6 +336,74 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps pnv_lpc_xscom_ops = {
>> .endianness = DEVICE_BIG_ENDIAN,
>> };
>>
>> +static uint64_t pnv_lpc_mmio_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned size)
>> +{
>> + PnvLpcController *lpc = PNV_LPC(opaque);
>> + uint64_t val = 0;
>> + uint32_t opb_addr = addr & ECCB_CTL_ADDR_MASK;
>> + MemTxResult result;
>> +
>> + switch (size) {
>> + case 4:
>> + val = address_space_ldl(&lpc->opb_as, opb_addr,
>> MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED,
>> + &result);
>> + break;
>> + case 1:
>> + val = address_space_ldub(&lpc->opb_as, opb_addr,
>> MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED,
>> + &result);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "OPB read failed at @0x%"
>> + HWADDR_PRIx " invalid size %d\n", addr, size);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (result != MEMTX_OK) {
>> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "OPB read failed at @0x%"
>> + HWADDR_PRIx "\n", addr);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return val;
>
> Couldn't you just map the relevant portion of the OPB AS into the MMIO
> AS, rather than having to forward the IOs with explicit read/write
> functions?
The underlying memory regions (ISA space, LPC HC, OPB regs) are the
same on POWER8. So this is one way to share the overall initialization.
What I would have liked to do is to simplified the ECCB interface
(see pnv_lpc_do_eccb()).
Thanks,
C.
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void pnv_lpc_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr,
>> + uint64_t val, unsigned size)
>> +{
>> + PnvLpcController *lpc = PNV_LPC(opaque);
>> + uint32_t opb_addr = addr & ECCB_CTL_ADDR_MASK;
>> + MemTxResult result;
>> +
>> + switch (size) {
>> + case 4:
>> + address_space_stl(&lpc->opb_as, opb_addr, val,
>> MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED,
>> + &result);
>> + break;
>> + case 1:
>> + address_space_stb(&lpc->opb_as, opb_addr, val,
>> MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED,
>> + &result);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "OPB write failed at @0x%"
>> + HWADDR_PRIx " invalid size %d\n", addr, size);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (result != MEMTX_OK) {
>> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_GUEST_ERROR, "OPB write failed at @0x%"
>> + HWADDR_PRIx "\n", addr);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const MemoryRegionOps pnv_lpc_mmio_ops = {
>> + .read = pnv_lpc_mmio_read,
>> + .write = pnv_lpc_mmio_write,
>> + .impl = {
>> + .min_access_size = 1,
>> + .max_access_size = 4,
>> + },
>> + .endianness = DEVICE_BIG_ENDIAN,
>> +};
>> +
>> static void pnv_lpc_eval_irqs(PnvLpcController *lpc)
>> {
>> bool lpc_to_opb_irq = false;
>> @@ -465,6 +627,43 @@ static const TypeInfo pnv_lpc_power8_info = {
>> }
>> };
>>
>> +static void pnv_lpc_power9_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>> +{
>> + PnvLpcController *lpc = PNV_LPC(dev);
>> + PnvLpcClass *plc = PNV_LPC_GET_CLASS(dev);
>> + Error *local_err = NULL;
>> +
>> + plc->parent_realize(dev, &local_err);
>> + if (local_err) {
>> + error_propagate(errp, local_err);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* P9 uses a MMIO region */
>> + memory_region_init_io(&lpc->xscom_regs, OBJECT(lpc), &pnv_lpc_mmio_ops,
>> + lpc, "lpcm", PNV9_LPCM_SIZE);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void pnv_lpc_power9_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>> +{
>> + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>> + PnvLpcClass *plc = PNV_LPC_CLASS(klass);
>> +
>> + dc->desc = "PowerNV LPC Controller POWER9";
>> +
>> + plc->psi_irq = PSIHB9_IRQ_LPCHC;
>> +
>> + device_class_set_parent_realize(dc, pnv_lpc_power9_realize,
>> + &plc->parent_realize);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const TypeInfo pnv_lpc_power9_info = {
>> + .name = TYPE_PNV9_LPC,
>> + .parent = TYPE_PNV_LPC,
>> + .instance_size = sizeof(PnvLpcController),
>> + .class_init = pnv_lpc_power9_class_init,
>> +};
>> +
>> static void pnv_lpc_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
>> {
>> PnvLpcController *lpc = PNV_LPC(dev);
>> @@ -540,6 +739,7 @@ static void pnv_lpc_register_types(void)
>> {
>> type_register_static(&pnv_lpc_info);
>> type_register_static(&pnv_lpc_power8_info);
>> + type_register_static(&pnv_lpc_power9_info);
>> }
>>
>> type_init(pnv_lpc_register_types)
>
- Re: [Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 16/27] ppc/pnv: lpc: fix OPB address ranges, (continued)
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 08/27] ppc/pnv: introduce a new pic_print_info() operation to the chip model, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/03/06
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 26/27] ppc/pnv: add a "ibm, opal/power-mgt" device tree node on POWER9, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/03/06
[Qemu-ppc] [PATCH 17/27] ppc/pnv: add a LPC Controller model class, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/03/06