qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 09/29] target/ppc: introduce get_cpu_v


From: Mark Cave-Ayland
Subject: Re: [Qemu-ppc] [Qemu-devel] [PULL 09/29] target/ppc: introduce get_cpu_vsr{l, h}() and set_cpu_vsr{l, h}() helpers for VSR register access
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 21:21:58 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0

On 06/06/2019 20:24, Laurent Vivier wrote:

> On 05/06/2019 09:43, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> On 05/06/2019 08:32, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
>>> On 04/06/2019 22:23, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>>>
>>>> This patch breaks something in the libcrypto.
>>>>
>>>> I've been able to reproduce the problem with Fedora 29:
>>>>
>>>> dnf install 'dnf-command(download)'
>>>> dnf download --source coreutils-single
>>>> rpm --verify coreutils-8.30-7.fc29.src.rpm
>>>> error: coreutils-8.30-7.fc29.src.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key 
>>>> ID 429476b4: BAD
>>>> error: coreutils-8.30-7.fc29.src.rpm: Header SHA256 digest: BAD (Expected 
>>>> fa042669e74ac435bd5defaa8c2e4efe779a0329c24f2b6377591c53b38aa280 != 
>>>> d6e22527412fafc4aa12882432d0d157e5427097710eeb2d5fce8fbc52a47be6)
>>>> error: coreutils-8.30-7.fc29.src.rpm: not an rpm package (or package 
>>>> manifest)
>>>>
>>>> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1715017
>>>>
>>>> I've tested with origin/master (47fbad45d47af8af784bb12a5719489edcd89b4c) 
>>>> and all the 
>>>> merged fixes for this patch don't fix this problem.
>>>>
>>>> We should be able to reproduce it on Debian Sid too: it breaks ssh (this 
>>>> is one of the rare binaries using libcrypto on debian).
>>>>
>>>> I've been able to reproduce it with qemu linux-user if I enable 
>>>> PPC_FEATURE2_VEC_CRYPTO in linux-user/elfload.c
>>>> (git clone -b linux-user-ppc64-hwcap address@hidden:vivier/qemu.git).
>>>>
>>>> To ease debugging, you can install a Fedora 29 chroot with something like:
>>>>
>>>> curl -o container.tar.xz 
>>>> http://download-ib01.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora-secondary/releases/29/Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Base-29-1.2.ppc64le.tar.xz
>>>> tar Jxvf container.tar.xz '*/layer.tar'
>>>> mkdir -p chroot/ppc64le/29
>>>> cd chroot/ppc64le/29
>>>> tar xf $OLDPWD/*/layer.tar
>>>> cd -
>>>> cp ~/qemu/ppc64le-linux-user/qemu-ppc64le chroot/ppc64le/29/
>>>> [use "configure --target-list=ppc64le-linux-user --static --disable-tools" 
>>>> and don't forget to run scripts/qemu-binfmt-conf.sh]
>>>
>>> One of Anton's VSX patches hasn't landed in master yet and is still queued 
>>> in
>>> ppc-for-4.1: "target/ppc: Fix lxvw4x, lxvh8x and lxvb16x".
>>>
>>> Can you try David's ppc-for-4.1 branch first and let me know if that solves 
>>> the
>>> issue? If not, I'll take a look at it later in the week when I have a bit 
>>> more time.
>>
>> Thank you Mark.
>>
>> Anton's patch fixes the problem.
> 
> But there are two problems remaining with Fedora 29:
> 
> - in libssl (openssl-libs-1.1.1-3.fc29.ppc64le):
> 
>   $ curl -o /dev/null https://www.google.com
>   ...
>   curl: (35) error:1408F119:SSL routines:ssl3_get_record:decryption failed or 
> bad record mac
> 
> - in the kernel (4.18.16-300.fc29.ppc64le):
> 
> [   39.742120] crypto_register_alg 'aes' = 0
> [   39.919286] crypto_register_alg 'cbc(aes)' = 0
> [   40.053942] crypto_register_alg 'ctr(aes)' = 0
> [   40.372764] alg: skcipher: Test 1 failed (invalid result) on encryption 
> for p8_aes_xts
> [   40.373458] 00000000: 91 7c f6 9e bd 68 b2 ec 9b 9f e9 a3 ea dd a6 92
> [   40.373568] 00000010: 98 10 35 57 5e dc 36 1e 9a f7 bc ba 39 f2 5c eb
> [   40.374139] crypto_register_alg 'xts(aes)' = 0
> [   40.389241] alg: hash: Test 2 failed for p8_ghash
> [   40.389422] 00000000: 5f 89 ab f7 20 57 20 57 20 57 20 57 20 57 20 57
> 
> My qemu is on top of 
> 
> 0d74f3b427 Merge remote-tracking branch 
> 'remotes/vivier2/tags/trivial-branch-pull-request' into staging
> + "target/ppc: Fix lxvw4x, lxvh8x and lxvb16x"

Hmmm and this is definitely a regression introduced by the same patch as given 
in the
subject?


ATB,

Mark.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]