Re: [PATCH 1/7] target/ppc: introduce get_dfp{64,128}() helper functions

qemu-ppc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/7] target/ppc: introduce get_dfp{64,128}() helper functions

From:	Richard Henderson
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 1/7] target/ppc: introduce get_dfp{64,128}() helper functions
Date:	Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:29:30 -0700
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0

On 9/24/19 2:05 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
> With the full patchset applied you'll see that get_dfp64() and friends are
> in exactly the same form you show above, and if I swap the arguments then
> the compiler does actually complain, although somewhat cryptically.
Oh, good.  I'll finish reading the whole set before making too many more
comments ahead of your actual steps.


r~

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[PATCH 0/7] target/ppc: DFP fixes and improvements, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2019/09/24
- [PATCH 1/7] target/ppc: introduce get_dfp{64,128}() helper functions, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2019/09/24
  - Re: [PATCH 1/7] target/ppc: introduce get_dfp{64,128}() helper functions, Richard Henderson, 2019/09/24
    - Re: [PATCH 1/7] target/ppc: introduce get_dfp{64,128}() helper functions, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2019/09/24
    - Re: [PATCH 1/7] target/ppc: introduce get_dfp{64,128}() helper functions, Richard Henderson <=
- [PATCH 2/7] target/ppc: introduce set_dfp{64,128}() helper functions, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2019/09/24
  - Re: [PATCH 2/7] target/ppc: introduce set_dfp{64,128}() helper functions, Richard Henderson, 2019/09/24
- [PATCH 3/7] target/ppc: update {get, set}_dfp{64, 128}() helper functions to read/write DFP numbers correctly, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2019/09/24
  - Re: [PATCH 3/7] target/ppc: update {get, set}_dfp{64, 128}() helper functions to read/write DFP numbers correctly, Richard Henderson, 2019/09/24
- [PATCH 6/7] target/ppc: use existing VsrD() macro to eliminate HI_IDX and LO_IDX from dfp_helper.c, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2019/09/24
  - Re: [PATCH 6/7] target/ppc: use existing VsrD() macro to eliminate HI_IDX and LO_IDX from dfp_helper.c, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2019/09/24
  - Re: [PATCH 6/7] target/ppc: use existing VsrD() macro to eliminate HI_IDX and LO_IDX from dfp_helper.c, Richard Henderson, 2019/09/24
    - Re: [PATCH 6/7] target/ppc: use existing VsrD() macro to eliminate HI_IDX and LO_IDX from dfp_helper.c, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2019/09/25
    - Re: [PATCH 6/7] target/ppc: use existing VsrD() macro to eliminate HI_IDX and LO_IDX from dfp_helper.c, Richard Henderson, 2019/09/26
- [PATCH 4/7] target/ppc: introduce dfp_finalize_decimal{64, 128}() helper functions, Mark Cave-Ayland, 2019/09/24

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/7] target/ppc: introduce set_dfp{64,128}() helper functions
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v14 5/7] ppc: spapr: Handle "ibm, nmi-register" and "ibm, nmi-interlock" RTAS calls
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/7] target/ppc: introduce get_dfp{64,128}() helper functions
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/7] target/ppc: introduce set_dfp{64,128}() helper functions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread