qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH v3 5/7] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buff


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: [PATCH v3 5/7] hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi: Do not mix SRP IU size with DMA buffer size
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 13:12:51 +0100

The 'union srp_iu' is meant as a pointer to any SRP Information
Unit type, it is not related to the size of a VIO DMA buffer.

Use a plain buffer for the VIO DMA read/write calls.
We can remove the reserved buffer from the 'union srp_iu'.

This issue was noticed when replacing the zero-length arrays
from hw/scsi/srp.h with flexible array member,
'clang -fsanitize=undefined' reported:

  hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c:69:29: error: field 'iu' with variable sized type 
'union viosrp_iu' not at the end of a struct or class is a GNU extension 
[-Werror,-Wgnu-variable-sized-type-not-at-end]
       union viosrp_iu         iu;
                               ^

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
---
v2: Removed unuseful _Static_assert (dgibson)
---
 hw/scsi/viosrp.h      |  1 -
 hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c | 10 +++++-----
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
index 25676c2383..e5f9768e8f 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
+++ b/hw/scsi/viosrp.h
@@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ union srp_iu {
     struct srp_tsk_mgmt tsk_mgmt;
     struct srp_cmd cmd;
     struct srp_rsp rsp;
-    uint8_t reserved[SRP_MAX_IU_LEN];
 };
 
 enum viosrp_crq_formats {
diff --git a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
index 70547f98ac..acf9bb50bc 100644
--- a/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
+++ b/hw/scsi/spapr_vscsi.c
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ typedef union vscsi_crq {
 
 typedef struct vscsi_req {
     vscsi_crq               crq;
-    union viosrp_iu         iu;
+    uint8_t                 viosrp_iu_buf[SRP_MAX_IU_LEN];
 
     /* SCSI request tracking */
     SCSIRequest             *sreq;
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ typedef struct {
 
 static union viosrp_iu *req_iu(vscsi_req *req)
 {
-    return &req->iu;
+    return (union viosrp_iu *)req->viosrp_iu_buf;
 }
 
 static struct vscsi_req *vscsi_get_req(VSCSIState *s)
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int vscsi_send_iu(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_req *req,
 
     /* First copy the SRP */
     rc = spapr_vio_dma_write(&s->vdev, req->crq.s.IU_data_ptr,
-                             &req->iu, length);
+                             &req->viosrp_iu_buf, length);
     if (rc) {
         fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_send_iu: DMA write failure !\n");
     }
@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static const VMStateDescription vmstate_spapr_vscsi_req = {
     .minimum_version_id = 1,
     .fields = (VMStateField[]) {
         VMSTATE_BUFFER(crq.raw, vscsi_req),
-        VMSTATE_BUFFER(iu.srp.reserved, vscsi_req),
+        VMSTATE_BUFFER(viosrp_iu_buf, vscsi_req),
         VMSTATE_UINT32(qtag, vscsi_req),
         VMSTATE_BOOL(active, vscsi_req),
         VMSTATE_UINT32(data_len, vscsi_req),
@@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ static void vscsi_got_payload(VSCSIState *s, vscsi_crq 
*crq)
     }
 
     /* XXX Handle failure differently ? */
-    if (spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, crq->s.IU_data_ptr, &req->iu,
+    if (spapr_vio_dma_read(&s->vdev, crq->s.IU_data_ptr, &req->viosrp_iu_buf,
                            crq->s.IU_length)) {
         fprintf(stderr, "vscsi_got_payload: DMA read failure !\n");
         vscsi_put_req(req);
-- 
2.21.1




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]