qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC v2 04/18] target/i386: sev: Embed SEVState in SevGuestState


From: David Gibson
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 04/18] target/i386: sev: Embed SEVState in SevGuestState
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 13:15:59 +1000

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:09:41AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 5/21/20 5:42 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > Currently SevGuestState contains only configuration information.  For
> > runtime state another non-QOM struct SEVState is allocated separately.
> > 
> > Simplify things by instead embedding the SEVState structure in
> > SevGuestState.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
> > ---
> >  target/i386/sev.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> >  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/target/i386/sev.c b/target/i386/sev.c
> > index b6ed719fb5..b4ab9720d6 100644
> > --- a/target/i386/sev.c
> > +++ b/target/i386/sev.c
> > @@ -35,6 +35,22 @@
> >  
> >  typedef struct SevGuestState SevGuestState;
> >  
> > +struct SEVState {
> > +    uint8_t api_major;
> > +    uint8_t api_minor;
> > +    uint8_t build_id;
> > +    uint32_t policy;
> > +    uint64_t me_mask;
> > +    uint32_t cbitpos;
> > +    uint32_t reduced_phys_bits;
> > +    uint32_t handle;
> > +    int sev_fd;
> > +    SevState state;
> > +    gchar *measurement;
> > +};
> > +
> > +typedef struct SEVState SEVState;
> 
> Maybe typedef & declaration altogether.

I'd prefer not - this makes it clearer that it's a pure code motion.
It's going to go away in a few patches time in any case.

> > +
> >  /**
> >   * SevGuestState:
> >   *
> > @@ -48,6 +64,7 @@ typedef struct SevGuestState SevGuestState;
> >  struct SevGuestState {
> >      Object parent_obj;
> >  
> > +    /* configuration parameters */
> >      char *sev_device;
> >      uint32_t policy;
> >      uint32_t handle;
> > @@ -55,25 +72,11 @@ struct SevGuestState {
> >      char *session_file;
> >      uint32_t cbitpos;
> >      uint32_t reduced_phys_bits;
> > -};
> >  
> > -struct SEVState {
> > -    SevGuestState *sev_info;
> > -    uint8_t api_major;
> > -    uint8_t api_minor;
> > -    uint8_t build_id;
> > -    uint32_t policy;
> > -    uint64_t me_mask;
> > -    uint32_t cbitpos;
> > -    uint32_t reduced_phys_bits;
> > -    uint32_t handle;
> > -    int sev_fd;
> > -    SevState state;
> > -    gchar *measurement;
> > +    /* runtime state */
> > +    SEVState state;
> >  };
> >  
> > -typedef struct SEVState SEVState;
> > -
> >  #define DEFAULT_GUEST_POLICY    0x1 /* disable debug */
> >  #define DEFAULT_SEV_DEVICE      "/dev/sev"
> >  
> > @@ -506,12 +509,12 @@ sev_read_file_base64(const char *filename, guchar 
> > **data, gsize *len)
> >  }
> >  
> >  static int
> > -sev_launch_start(SEVState *s)
> > +sev_launch_start(SevGuestState *sev)
> >  {
> > +    SEVState *s = &sev->state;
> >      gsize sz;
> >      int ret = 1;
> >      int fw_error, rc;
> > -    SevGuestState *sev = s->sev_info;
> >      struct kvm_sev_launch_start *start;
> >      guchar *session = NULL, *dh_cert = NULL;
> >  
> > @@ -686,6 +689,7 @@ sev_vm_state_change(void *opaque, int running, RunState 
> > state)
> >  void *
> >  sev_guest_init(const char *id)
> >  {
> > +    SevGuestState *sev;
> >      SEVState *s;
> >      char *devname;
> >      int ret, fw_error;
> > @@ -693,27 +697,27 @@ sev_guest_init(const char *id)
> >      uint32_t host_cbitpos;
> >      struct sev_user_data_status status = {};
> >  
> > -    sev_state = s = g_new0(SEVState, 1);
> > -    s->sev_info = lookup_sev_guest_info(id);
> > -    if (!s->sev_info) {
> > +    sev = lookup_sev_guest_info(id);
> > +    if (!sev) {
> >          error_report("%s: '%s' is not a valid '%s' object",
> >                       __func__, id, TYPE_SEV_GUEST);
> >          goto err;
> >      }
> >  
> > +    sev_state = s = &sev->state;
> 
> I was going to suggest to clean that, but I see your next patch already
> does the cleanup :)
> 
> Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> 
> >      s->state = SEV_STATE_UNINIT;
> >  
> >      host_cpuid(0x8000001F, 0, NULL, &ebx, NULL, NULL);
> >      host_cbitpos = ebx & 0x3f;
> >  
> > -    s->cbitpos = object_property_get_int(OBJECT(s->sev_info), "cbitpos", 
> > NULL);
> > +    s->cbitpos = object_property_get_int(OBJECT(sev), "cbitpos", NULL);
> >      if (host_cbitpos != s->cbitpos) {
> >          error_report("%s: cbitpos check failed, host '%d' requested '%d'",
> >                       __func__, host_cbitpos, s->cbitpos);
> >          goto err;
> >      }
> >  
> > -    s->reduced_phys_bits = object_property_get_int(OBJECT(s->sev_info),
> > +    s->reduced_phys_bits = object_property_get_int(OBJECT(sev),
> >                                          "reduced-phys-bits", NULL);
> >      if (s->reduced_phys_bits < 1) {
> >          error_report("%s: reduced_phys_bits check failed, it should be 
> > >=1,"
> > @@ -723,7 +727,7 @@ sev_guest_init(const char *id)
> >  
> >      s->me_mask = ~(1UL << s->cbitpos);
> >  
> > -    devname = object_property_get_str(OBJECT(s->sev_info), "sev-device", 
> > NULL);
> > +    devname = object_property_get_str(OBJECT(sev), "sev-device", NULL);
> >      s->sev_fd = open(devname, O_RDWR);
> >      if (s->sev_fd < 0) {
> >          error_report("%s: Failed to open %s '%s'", __func__,
> > @@ -754,7 +758,7 @@ sev_guest_init(const char *id)
> >          goto err;
> >      }
> >  
> > -    ret = sev_launch_start(s);
> > +    ret = sev_launch_start(sev);
> >      if (ret) {
> >          error_report("%s: failed to create encryption context", __func__);
> >          goto err;
> > 
> 

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]