[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Pegasos2 emulation

From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Pegasos2 emulation
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2021 13:11:19 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0

Le 16/03/2021 à 12:49, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé a écrit :
> On 3/16/21 10:01 AM, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Le 15/03/2021 à 13:33, BALATON Zoltan a écrit :
>>> On Sat, 13 Mar 2021, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>> I've started posting this series well in advance to get it into 6.0 and 
>>>> yet it seems like it may
>>>> be missing it due to organisational issues (no real complaints were found 
>>>> with patches but
>>>> Philippe seems to like more review that does not seem to happen as nobody 
>>>> is interested). Looks
>>>> like David is waiting for an ack from Philippe but will be away next week 
>>>> so if this is not
>>>> resolved now it may be too late on Monday. To avoid that:
>>>> David, could you please send an ack before you leave for the last two 
>>>> patches so it could get
>>>> committed via some other tree while you're away?
>>>> Philippe, if you can't ack the vt82c686 patches now are you OK with taking 
>>>> the whole series via
>>>> your tree before the freeze? That would give you some more days to review 
>>>> and it could always be
>>>> reverted during the freeze but if it's not merged now I'll have to wait 
>>>> until the summer to get it
>>>> in again which would be another long delay. I don't think this will get 
>>>> more reviews unless it's
>>>> in master and people can start using and testing it better.
>>> Hello,
>>> Since David seems to be away for this week before seeing my mail asking for 
>>> an ack from him, now
>>> this can only get in by Philippe or Peter. (David said before he'd be OK 
>>> with the series if Philippe
>>> acked it so I think that can count as an implicit ack and it could always 
>>> be reverted before the
>>> releease.)
>>> Philippe, do you have anything against this to get merged now? If not 
>>> please send a pull or ack it
>>> so it has a chance to be in 6.0 or tell if you still intend to do anything 
>>> about it before the
>>> freeze. This series was on the list since January and the remaining parts 
>>> you did not take are here
>>> since February 22nd and the version after your first review since two weeks 
>>> so it would be nice to
>>> sort this out and not block it any further without a good reason.
>> Pegasos looks like a New World PowerMac, so perhaps Mark can help?
> The PPC part is mostly reviewed. The problem is the first patch:
> "vt82c686: Implement control of serial port io ranges via config regs".

vt82c686.c is a Fuloong 2E file, why Fuloong 2E maintainers are not involved in 
the review?


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]