qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] ppc/pnv: update skiboot to commit 820d43c0a775.


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc/pnv: update skiboot to commit 820d43c0a775.
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:14:05 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0

On 8/9/21 10:06 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 8/9/21 9:55 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>> Hello Phil,
>>
>> On 8/9/21 9:06 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> Hi Cédric,
>>>
>>> On 8/6/21 8:00 PM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>>> It includes support for the POWER10 processor and the QEMU platform.
>>>
>>> 1/ Can you include the output of 'git shortlog v6.4..820d43c0' here?
>>
>> OK. See attachement.
> 
> By "here" I meant in the commit description ;)

yeah I know but David queued the patch already.

> 
>>>>
>>>> Built from submodule.
>>>
>>> 2/ Could we have a CI job building this, during 6.2 cycle?
>>>    (See .gitlab-ci.d/edk2.yml and .gitlab-ci.d/opensbi.yml)
>>
>> Sure. It doesn't look too complex. 
>>
>> I plan to add acceptance tests for the QEMU powernv machines also 
>> once the OpenPOWER files (zImage.epapr and rootfs.cpio.xz) are 
>> published on GH.
>>  
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>  pc-bios/skiboot.lid | Bin 1667280 -> 2528128 bytes
>>>>  roms/skiboot        |   2 +-
>>>>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/pc-bios/skiboot.lid b/pc-bios/skiboot.lid
>>>> index 
>>>> 504b95e8b6611aff3a934ff10f789934680591f9..8a3c278512a428a034ed5b1ddbed017ae8c0a9d0
>>>>  100644
>>>> GIT binary patch
>>>> literal 2528128
>>>
>>> Consider using 'git-format-patch --no-binary' and a reference
>>> to your repository to fetch a such big binary patch.
>>
>> David would pull from my tree then ? So that's like doing a PR. 
>> We can do that next time I send an update if David is OK with 
>> that. I should send an update for v7.0 tag. 
> 
> As you wish. Big patches gave us troubles, i.e. they make crash
> the 'patches' instance. 2.5MiB is probably borderline and I'm
> being nit-picky.
> 

If we can do a PR next time, all should be fine.

Thanks,

C.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]