qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 09/16] PPC64/TCG: Implement 'rfebb' instruction


From: Daniel Henrique Barboza
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/16] PPC64/TCG: Implement 'rfebb' instruction
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 15:41:36 -0300
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0



On 8/30/21 9:12 AM, Matheus K. Ferst wrote:
On 24/08/2021 13:30, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
[E-MAIL EXTERNO] Não clique em links ou abra anexos, a menos que você possa 
confirmar o remetente e saber que o conteúdo é seguro. Em caso de e-mail 
suspeito entre imediatamente em contato com o DTI.

An Event-Based Branch (EBB) allows applications to change the NIA when a
event-based exception occurs. Event-based exceptions are enabled by
setting the Branch Event Status and Control Register (BESCR). If the
event-based exception is enabled when the exception occurs, an EBB
happens.

The EBB will:

- set the Global Enable (GE) bit of BESCR to 0;
- set bits 0-61 of the Event-Based Branch Return Register (EBBRR) to the
   effective address of the NIA that would have executed if the EBB
   didn't happen;
- Instruction fetch and execution will continue in the effective address
   contained in the Event-Based Branch Handler Register (EBBHR).

The EBB Handler will process the event and then execute the Return From
Event-Based Branch (rfebb) instruction. rfebb sets BESCR_GE and then
redirects execution to the address pointed in EBBRR. This process is
described in the PowerISA v3.1, Book II, Chapter 6 [1].

This patch implements the rfebb instruction. Descriptions of all
relevant BESCR bits are also added - this patch is only using BESCR_GE,
but the next patches will use the remaining bits.

[1] https://wiki.raptorcs.com/w/images/f/f5/PowerISA_public.v3.1.pdf

Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
---
  target/ppc/cpu.h                       | 13 +++++++++++
  target/ppc/excp_helper.c               | 24 +++++++++++++++++++
  target/ppc/helper.h                    |  1 +
  target/ppc/insn32.decode               |  5 ++++
  target/ppc/translate.c                 |  2 ++
  target/ppc/translate/branch-impl.c.inc | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  6 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 target/ppc/translate/branch-impl.c.inc

diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu.h b/target/ppc/cpu.h
index 105ee75a01..9d5eb9ead4 100644
--- a/target/ppc/cpu.h
+++ b/target/ppc/cpu.h
@@ -363,6 +363,19 @@ typedef struct ppc_v3_pate_t {
  /* PMU uses CTRL_RUN to sample PM_RUN_INST_CMPL */
  #define CTRL_RUN PPC_BIT(63)

+/* EBB/BESCR bits */
+/* Global Enable */
+#define BESCR_GE PPC_BIT(0)
+/* External Event-based Exception Enable */
+#define BESCR_EE PPC_BIT(30)
+/* Performance Monitor Event-based Exception Enable */
+#define BESCR_PME PPC_BIT(31)
+/* External Event-based Exception Occurred */
+#define BESCR_EEO PPC_BIT(62)
+/* Performance Monitor Event-based Exception Occurred */
+#define BESCR_PMEO PPC_BIT(63)
+#define BESCR_INVALID PPC_BITMASK(32, 33)
+
  /* LPCR bits */
  #define LPCR_VPM0         PPC_BIT(0)
  #define LPCR_VPM1         PPC_BIT(1)
diff --git a/target/ppc/excp_helper.c b/target/ppc/excp_helper.c
index 7b6ac16eef..058b063d8a 100644
--- a/target/ppc/excp_helper.c
+++ b/target/ppc/excp_helper.c
@@ -1281,6 +1281,30 @@ void helper_hrfid(CPUPPCState *env)
  }
  #endif

+#ifdef CONFIG_TCG
+void helper_rfebb(CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong s)
+{
+    /*
+     * Handling of BESCR bits 32:33 according to PowerISA v3.1:
+     *
+     * "If BESCR 32:33 != 0b00 the instruction is treated as if
+     *  the instruction form were invalid."
+     */
+    if (env->spr[SPR_BESCR] & BESCR_INVALID) {
+        raise_exception_err(env, POWERPC_EXCP_PROGRAM,
+                            POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL | POWERPC_EXCP_INVAL_INVAL);
+    }
+
+    env->nip = env->spr[SPR_EBBRR];

Hi Daniel,

Should we check msr_is_64bit and crop EBBRR here? Also, I believe this helper 
should be inside a #if defined(TARGET_PPC64) ...

Good catch. Yes, we need. PowerISA mentions:

"If there are no pending event-based exceptions, then
the next instruction is fetched from the address
EBBRR 0:61 || 0b00 (when MSR SF =1) or 32 0 ||
EBBRR 32:61 || 0b00 (when MSR SF =0)."


I'll fix it in the next spin, together with the 'if defined(TARGET_PPC64)' you 
also mentioned.



+
+    if (s) {
+        env->spr[SPR_BESCR] |= BESCR_GE;
+    } else {
+        env->spr[SPR_BESCR] &= ~BESCR_GE;
+    }
+}
+#endif
+
  
/*****************************************************************************/
  /* Embedded PowerPC specific helpers */
  void helper_40x_rfci(CPUPPCState *env)
diff --git a/target/ppc/helper.h b/target/ppc/helper.h
index 47dbbe6da1..91a86992a5 100644
--- a/target/ppc/helper.h
+++ b/target/ppc/helper.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ DEF_HELPER_2(pminsn, void, env, i32)
  DEF_HELPER_1(rfid, void, env)
  DEF_HELPER_1(rfscv, void, env)
  DEF_HELPER_1(hrfid, void, env)
+DEF_HELPER_2(rfebb, void, env, tl)

... as its DEF_HELPER is.

  DEF_HELPER_2(store_lpcr, void, env, tl)
  DEF_HELPER_2(store_pcr, void, env, tl)
  DEF_HELPER_2(store_mmcr0, void, env, tl)
diff --git a/target/ppc/insn32.decode b/target/ppc/insn32.decode
index 9fd8d6b817..bd0b88b0b6 100644
--- a/target/ppc/insn32.decode
+++ b/target/ppc/insn32.decode
@@ -124,3 +124,8 @@ SETNBCR         011111 ..... ..... ----- 0111100000 -   
@X_bi
  ## Vector Bit Manipulation Instruction

  VCFUGED         000100 ..... ..... ..... 10101001101    @VX
+
+### rfebb
+&RFEBB          s:uint8_t
+@RFEBB          ......-------------- s:1 .......... -   &RFEBB
+RFEBB           010011-------------- .   0010010010 -   @RFEBB

Maybe it only makes sense with Book I instructions, but we've been naming 
fmt_def/arg_def according to the instruction format, so I'd suggest naming it 
@XL/&XL or @XL_s/&XL_s.

Alright.


diff --git a/target/ppc/translate.c b/target/ppc/translate.c
index d45ce79a3e..d4cfc567cf 100644
--- a/target/ppc/translate.c
+++ b/target/ppc/translate.c
@@ -7643,6 +7643,8 @@ static int times_4(DisasContext *ctx, int x)

  #include "translate/spe-impl.c.inc"

+#include "translate/branch-impl.c.inc"
+
  /* Handles lfdp, lxsd, lxssp */
  static void gen_dform39(DisasContext *ctx)
  {
diff --git a/target/ppc/translate/branch-impl.c.inc 
b/target/ppc/translate/branch-impl.c.inc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..2e309e9889
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/ppc/translate/branch-impl.c.inc
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+/*
+ * Power ISA decode for branch instructions
+ *
+ *  Copyright IBM Corp. 2021
+ *
+ * Authors:
+ *  Daniel Henrique Barboza      <danielhb413@gmail.com>
+ *
+ * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later.
+ * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
+ */
+
+#if defined(TARGET_PPC64) && !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
+
+static bool trans_RFEBB(DisasContext *ctx, arg_RFEBB *arg)
+{
+    REQUIRE_INSNS_FLAGS2(ctx, ISA207S);
+
+    gen_icount_io_start(ctx);
+    gen_update_cfar(ctx, ctx->cia);
+    gen_helper_rfebb(cpu_env, cpu_gpr[arg->s]);
+
+    ctx->base.is_jmp = DISAS_CHAIN;
+
+    return true;
+}
+#else
+static bool trans_RFEBB(DisasContext *ctx, arg_RFEBB *arg)
+{
+    return true;

That would be a no-op for !TARGET_PPC64, I think it's more appropriate to call 
gen_invalid(ctx) or let REQUIRE_INSNS_FLAGS2 handle this. I'm not sure what 
should be done in the CONFIG_USER_ONLY case.


I'll use 'gen_invalid(ctx)' since this is what is being done in 
fixedpoint-impl.c.inc
(albeit for a different reason I guess).


Thanks,


Daniel


+}
+#endif
--
2.31.1






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]