Re: [PATCH 3/5] bulk: Replace [g_]assert(0) -> g_assert_not_reached()

[Thomas Huth]

On 22/02/2023 00.25, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> In order to avoid warnings such commit c0a6665c3c ("target/i386:
> Remove compilation errors when -Werror=maybe-uninitialized"),
> replace all assert(0) and g_assert(0) by g_assert_not_reached().
>
> Remove any code following g_assert_not_reached().
>
> See previous commit for rationale.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/hw/net/i82596.c b/hw/net/i82596.c
> index ec21e2699a..eda0f586fb 100644
> --- a/hw/net/i82596.c
> +++ b/hw/net/i82596.c
> @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static void command_loop(I82596State *s)
>           case CmdDump:
>           case CmdDiagnose:
>               printf("FIXME Command %d !!\n", cmd & 7);
> -            assert(0);
> +            g_assert_not_reached();
>           }

While looking at this patch a second time, this hunk caught my eye. It looks 
like the guest could use these commands to crash QEMU? Should this be a 
qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP,...) + graceful return instead?

 Thomas