[Qemu-riscv] [PATCH for 4.0 v1 1/5] riscv: plic: Fix incorrect irq calculation

[Alistair Francis]

The irq is incorrectly calculated to be off by one. It has worked in the
past as the priority_base offset has also been set incorrectly. We are
about to fix the priority_base offset so first first the irq
calculation.

Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <address@hidden>
---
 hw/riscv/sifive_plic.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/riscv/sifive_plic.c b/hw/riscv/sifive_plic.c
index 1c703e1a37..70a85cd075 100644
--- a/hw/riscv/sifive_plic.c
+++ b/hw/riscv/sifive_plic.c
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ static uint64_t sifive_plic_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, 
unsigned size)
     if (addr >= plic->priority_base && /* 4 bytes per source */
         addr < plic->priority_base + (plic->num_sources << 2))
     {
-        uint32_t irq = (addr - plic->priority_base) >> 2;
+        uint32_t irq = ((addr - plic->priority_base) >> 2) + 1;
         if (RISCV_DEBUG_PLIC) {
             qemu_log("plic: read priority: irq=%d priority=%d\n",
                 irq, plic->source_priority[irq]);
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ static void sifive_plic_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, 
uint64_t value,
     if (addr >= plic->priority_base && /* 4 bytes per source */
         addr < plic->priority_base + (plic->num_sources << 2))
     {
-        uint32_t irq = (addr - plic->priority_base) >> 2;
+        uint32_t irq = ((addr - plic->priority_base) >> 2) + 1;
         plic->source_priority[irq] = value & 7;
         if (RISCV_DEBUG_PLIC) {
             qemu_log("plic: write priority: irq=%d priority=%d\n",
-- 
2.21.0