[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 11/11] RISC-V: Add initial support for T-Head C906 and C910 C
Re: [PATCH 11/11] RISC-V: Add initial support for T-Head C906 and C910 CPUs
Thu, 8 Sep 2022 09:56:24 +0100
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
On 9/8/22 09:23, Christoph Müllner wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:46 AM Richard Henderson <email@example.com
On 9/6/22 13:22, Christoph Muellner wrote:
> + DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_THEAD_C906,
> + DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_THEAD_C910,
Why model both if they're identical?
I figured that users might expect that (existence of "thead-c906" and
And using "thead-c9xx" feels like it would be regretted in the future.
Should I drop "thead-c910"?
Quite possibly. For Arm, we don't try to supply every cpu model, only those that differ
in some substantial way.
[PATCH 10/11] RISC-V: Adding T-Head FMemIdx extension, Christoph Muellner, 2022/09/06
[PATCH 06/11] RISC-V: Adding T-Head multiply-accumulate instructions, Christoph Muellner, 2022/09/06
[PATCH 07/11] RISC-V: Adding T-Head XMAE support, Christoph Muellner, 2022/09/06
- Re: [PATCH 04/11] RISC-V: Adding T-Head Bitmanip instructions, (continued)