On 9/8/22 09:23, Christoph Müllner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 9:46 AM Richard Henderson <email@example.com
> <mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org>> wrote:
> On 9/6/22 13:22, Christoph Muellner wrote:
> > + DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_THEAD_C906, rv64_thead_c906_cpu_init),
> > + DEFINE_CPU(TYPE_RISCV_CPU_THEAD_C910, rv64_thead_c906_cpu_init),
> Why model both if they're identical?
> I figured that users might expect that (existence of "thead-c906" and "thead-c910").
> And using "thead-c9xx" feels like it would be regretted in the future.
> Should I drop "thead-c910"?
Quite possibly. For Arm, we don't try to supply every cpu model, only those that differ
in some substantial way.
Ok, will do.