qemu-riscv
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v10 4/5] target/riscv: smstateen check for fcsr


From: weiwei
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 4/5] target/riscv: smstateen check for fcsr
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2022 21:02:59 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0


On 2022/10/3 19:47, Mayuresh Chitale wrote:
If smstateen is implemented and sstateen0.fcsr is clear then the floating point
operations must return illegal instruction exception or virtual instruction
trap, if relevant.

Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@ventanamicro.com>
---
  target/riscv/csr.c                        | 23 ++++++++++++
  target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc   | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++--
  target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc | 12 +++++++
  3 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/csr.c b/target/riscv/csr.c
index 71236f2b5d..8b25f885ec 100644
--- a/target/riscv/csr.c
+++ b/target/riscv/csr.c
@@ -84,6 +84,10 @@ static RISCVException fs(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno)
          !RISCV_CPU(env_cpu(env))->cfg.ext_zfinx) {
          return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST;
      }
+
+    if (!env->debugger && !riscv_cpu_fp_enabled(env)) {
+        return smstateen_acc_ok(env, 0, SMSTATEEN0_FCSR);
+    }
  #endif
      return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
  }
@@ -2023,6 +2027,9 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
                                        target_ulong new_val)
  {
      uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;
+    if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) {
+        wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR;
+    }
return write_mstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);
  }
@@ -2059,6 +2066,10 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState 
*env, int csrno,
  {
      uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;
+ if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) {
+        wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR;
+    }
+
      return write_mstateenh(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);
  }
@@ -2096,6 +2107,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
  {
      uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;
+ if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) {
+        wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR;
+    }
+
      return write_hstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);
  }
@@ -2135,6 +2150,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
  {
      uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;
+ if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) {
+        wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR;
+    }
+
      return write_hstateenh(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);
  }
@@ -2182,6 +2201,10 @@ static RISCVException write_sstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
  {
      uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;
+ if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) {
+        wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR;
+    }
+
      return write_sstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);
  }
diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc
index a1d3eb52ad..93657680c6 100644
--- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc
+++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc
@@ -24,9 +24,46 @@
              return false; \
  } while (0)
-#define REQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_F(ctx) do {\
-    if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx) { \
-        REQUIRE_EXT(ctx, RVF); \
+#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY
+static inline bool smstateen_fcsr_check(DisasContext *ctx, int index)
+{
+    CPUState *cpu = ctx->cs;
+    CPURISCVState *env = cpu->env_ptr;
+    uint64_t stateen = env->mstateen[index];
+
+    if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_smstateen || env->priv == PRV_M) {
+        return true;
+    }
+
+    if (ctx->virt_enabled) {
+        stateen &= env->hstateen[index];
+    }
+
+    if (env->priv == PRV_U && has_ext(ctx, RVS)) {
+        stateen &= env->sstateen[index];
+    }
+
+    if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN0_FCSR)) {
+        if (ctx->virt_enabled) {
+            ctx->virt_inst_excp = true;
+        }

Are there any considerations for adding  virt_inst_excp instead of directly

"generate_exception(ctx, RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT)" here?

Regards,

Weiwei Li

+        return false;
+    }
+
+    return true;
+}
+#else
+#define smstateen_fcsr_check(ctx, index) (true)
+#endif
+
+#define REQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_F(ctx) do { \
+    if (!has_ext(ctx, RVF)) { \
+        if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx) { \
+            return false; \
+        } \
+        if (!smstateen_fcsr_check(ctx, 0)) { \
+            return false; \
+        } \
      } \
  } while (0)
diff --git a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc
index 5d07150cd0..6c2e338c0a 100644
--- a/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc
+++ b/target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc
@@ -20,18 +20,27 @@
      if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh) {      \
          return false;         \
      }                         \
+    if (!smstateen_fcsr_check(ctx, 0)) { \
+        return false; \
+    } \
  } while (0)
#define REQUIRE_ZHINX_OR_ZFH(ctx) do { \
      if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinx && !ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh) { \
          return false;                  \
      }                                  \
+    if (!smstateen_fcsr_check(ctx, 0)) { \
+        return false; \
+    } \
  } while (0)
#define REQUIRE_ZFH_OR_ZFHMIN(ctx) do { \
      if (!(ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfhmin)) { \
          return false;                         \
      }                                         \
+    if (!smstateen_fcsr_check(ctx, 0)) { \
+        return false; \
+    } \
  } while (0)
#define REQUIRE_ZFH_OR_ZFHMIN_OR_ZHINX_OR_ZHINXMIN(ctx) do { \
@@ -39,6 +48,9 @@
            ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinx || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinxmin)) {     \
          return false;                                        \
      }                                                        \
+    if (!smstateen_fcsr_check(ctx, 0)) { \
+        return false; \
+    } \
  } while (0)
static bool trans_flh(DisasContext *ctx, arg_flh *a)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]