[PATCH 05/18] target/riscv: Coding style fixes in csr.c

qemu-riscv

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PATCH 05/18] target/riscv: Coding style fixes in csr.c

From:	Bin Meng
Subject:	[PATCH 05/18] target/riscv: Coding style fixes in csr.c
Date:	Tue, 14 Feb 2023 02:02:01 +0800

Fix various places that violate QEMU coding style:

- correct multi-line comment format
- indent to opening parenthesis

Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng@tinylab.org>
---

 target/riscv/csr.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/riscv/csr.c b/target/riscv/csr.c
index c2dd9d5af0..cc74819759 100644
--- a/target/riscv/csr.c
+++ b/target/riscv/csr.c
@@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ static RISCVException sstc_32(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno)
 }
 
 static RISCVException read_vstimecmp(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                    target_ulong *val)
+                                     target_ulong *val)
 {
     *val = env->vstimecmp;
 
@@ -971,7 +971,7 @@ static RISCVException read_vstimecmp(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException read_vstimecmph(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                    target_ulong *val)
+                                      target_ulong *val)
 {
     *val = env->vstimecmp >> 32;
 
@@ -979,7 +979,7 @@ static RISCVException read_vstimecmph(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_vstimecmp(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                    target_ulong val)
+                                      target_ulong val)
 {
     RISCVCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
 
@@ -996,7 +996,7 @@ static RISCVException write_vstimecmp(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_vstimecmph(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                    target_ulong val)
+                                       target_ulong val)
 {
     RISCVCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
 
@@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ static RISCVException read_stimecmp(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException read_stimecmph(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                    target_ulong *val)
+                                     target_ulong *val)
 {
     if (riscv_cpu_virt_enabled(env)) {
         *val = env->vstimecmp >> 32;
@@ -1032,7 +1032,7 @@ static RISCVException read_stimecmph(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_stimecmp(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                    target_ulong val)
+                                     target_ulong val)
 {
     RISCVCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
 
@@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ static RISCVException write_stimecmp(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_stimecmph(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                    target_ulong val)
+                                      target_ulong val)
 {
     RISCVCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
 
@@ -1342,7 +1342,8 @@ static RISCVException write_misa(CPURISCVState *env, int 
csrno,
 
     /* 'E' excludes all other extensions */
     if (val & RVE) {
-        /* when we support 'E' we can do "val = RVE;" however
+        /*
+         * when we support 'E' we can do "val = RVE;" however
          * for now we just drop writes if 'E' is present.
          */
         return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
@@ -1364,7 +1365,8 @@ static RISCVException write_misa(CPURISCVState *env, int 
csrno,
         val &= ~RVD;
     }
 
-    /* Suppress 'C' if next instruction is not aligned
+    /*
+     * Suppress 'C' if next instruction is not aligned
      * TODO: this should check next_pc
      */
     if ((val & RVC) && (GETPC() & ~3) != 0) {
@@ -1833,28 +1835,28 @@ static RISCVException write_mscratch(CPURISCVState 
*env, int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException read_mepc(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                     target_ulong *val)
+                                target_ulong *val)
 {
     *val = env->mepc;
     return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_mepc(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                     target_ulong val)
+                                 target_ulong val)
 {
     env->mepc = val;
     return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
 }
 
 static RISCVException read_mcause(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                     target_ulong *val)
+                                  target_ulong *val)
 {
     *val = env->mcause;
     return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_mcause(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                     target_ulong val)
+                                   target_ulong val)
 {
     env->mcause = val;
     return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
@@ -1876,14 +1878,14 @@ static RISCVException write_mtval(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 
 /* Execution environment configuration setup */
 static RISCVException read_menvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                 target_ulong *val)
+                                   target_ulong *val)
 {
     *val = env->menvcfg;
     return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_menvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                  target_ulong val)
+                                    target_ulong val)
 {
     uint64_t mask = MENVCFG_FIOM | MENVCFG_CBIE | MENVCFG_CBCFE | MENVCFG_CBZE;
 
@@ -1896,14 +1898,14 @@ static RISCVException write_menvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException read_menvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                 target_ulong *val)
+                                    target_ulong *val)
 {
     *val = env->menvcfg >> 32;
     return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_menvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                  target_ulong val)
+                                     target_ulong val)
 {
     uint64_t mask = MENVCFG_PBMTE | MENVCFG_STCE;
     uint64_t valh = (uint64_t)val << 32;
@@ -1914,7 +1916,7 @@ static RISCVException write_menvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException read_senvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                 target_ulong *val)
+                                   target_ulong *val)
 {
     RISCVException ret;
 
@@ -1928,7 +1930,7 @@ static RISCVException read_senvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_senvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                  target_ulong val)
+                                    target_ulong val)
 {
     uint64_t mask = SENVCFG_FIOM | SENVCFG_CBIE | SENVCFG_CBCFE | SENVCFG_CBZE;
     RISCVException ret;
@@ -1943,7 +1945,7 @@ static RISCVException write_senvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException read_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                 target_ulong *val)
+                                   target_ulong *val)
 {
     RISCVException ret;
 
@@ -1957,7 +1959,7 @@ static RISCVException read_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                  target_ulong val)
+                                    target_ulong val)
 {
     uint64_t mask = HENVCFG_FIOM | HENVCFG_CBIE | HENVCFG_CBCFE | HENVCFG_CBZE;
     RISCVException ret;
@@ -1977,7 +1979,7 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException read_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                 target_ulong *val)
+                                    target_ulong *val)
 {
     RISCVException ret;
 
@@ -1991,7 +1993,7 @@ static RISCVException read_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                  target_ulong val)
+                                     target_ulong val)
 {
     uint64_t mask = HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE;
     uint64_t valh = (uint64_t)val << 32;
@@ -2034,13 +2036,13 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState 
*env, int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_mstateen_1_3(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                      target_ulong new_val)
+                                         target_ulong new_val)
 {
     return write_mstateen(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEEN, new_val);
 }
 
 static RISCVException read_mstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                      target_ulong *val)
+                                     target_ulong *val)
 {
     *val = env->mstateen[csrno - CSR_MSTATEEN0H] >> 32;
 
@@ -2061,7 +2063,7 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                      target_ulong new_val)
+                                       target_ulong new_val)
 {
     uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;
 
@@ -2069,7 +2071,7 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState 
*env, int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_mstateenh_1_3(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                      target_ulong new_val)
+                                          target_ulong new_val)
 {
     return write_mstateenh(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEEN, new_val);
 }
@@ -2106,7 +2108,7 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_hstateen_1_3(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                      target_ulong new_val)
+                                         target_ulong new_val)
 {
     return write_hstateen(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEEN, new_val);
 }
@@ -2145,7 +2147,7 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState 
*env, int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_hstateenh_1_3(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                                       target_ulong new_val)
+                                          target_ulong new_val)
 {
     return write_hstateenh(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEEN, new_val);
 }
@@ -3338,7 +3340,7 @@ static RISCVException read_mseccfg(CPURISCVState *env, 
int csrno,
 }
 
 static RISCVException write_mseccfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
-                         target_ulong val)
+                                    target_ulong val)
 {
     mseccfg_csr_write(env, val);
     return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
-- 
2.25.1

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[PATCH 00/18] target/riscv: Various fixes to gdbstub and CSR access, Bin Meng, 2023/02/13
- [PATCH 01/18] target/riscv: gdbstub: Check priv spec version before reporting CSR, Bin Meng, 2023/02/13
  - Re: [PATCH 01/18] target/riscv: gdbstub: Check priv spec version before reporting CSR, weiwei, 2023/02/14
  - Re: [PATCH 01/18] target/riscv: gdbstub: Check priv spec version before reporting CSR, LIU Zhiwei, 2023/02/16
- [PATCH 03/18] target/riscv: gdbstub: Minor change for better readability, Bin Meng, 2023/02/13
  - Re: [PATCH 03/18] target/riscv: gdbstub: Minor change for better readability, weiwei, 2023/02/14
  - Re: [PATCH 03/18] target/riscv: gdbstub: Minor change for better readability, LIU Zhiwei, 2023/02/16
- [PATCH 05/18] target/riscv: Coding style fixes in csr.c, Bin Meng <=
  - Re: [PATCH 05/18] target/riscv: Coding style fixes in csr.c, weiwei, 2023/02/14
  - Re: [PATCH 05/18] target/riscv: Coding style fixes in csr.c, LIU Zhiwei, 2023/02/16
- [PATCH 06/18] target/riscv: Use 'bool' type for read_only, Bin Meng, 2023/02/13
  - Re: [PATCH 06/18] target/riscv: Use 'bool' type for read_only, weiwei, 2023/02/14
  - Re: [PATCH 06/18] target/riscv: Use 'bool' type for read_only, LIU Zhiwei, 2023/02/16
- [PATCH 04/18] target/riscv: gdbstub: Do not generate CSR XML if Zicsr is disabled, Bin Meng, 2023/02/13
  - Re: [PATCH 04/18] target/riscv: gdbstub: Do not generate CSR XML if Zicsr is disabled, weiwei, 2023/02/14
  - Re: [PATCH 04/18] target/riscv: gdbstub: Do not generate CSR XML if Zicsr is disabled, LIU Zhiwei, 2023/02/16
- [PATCH 02/18] target/riscv: Correct the priority policy of riscv_csrrw_check(), Bin Meng, 2023/02/13
  - Re: [PATCH 02/18] target/riscv: Correct the priority policy of riscv_csrrw_check(), weiwei, 2023/02/14

Prev by Date: [PATCH 00/18] target/riscv: Various fixes to gdbstub and CSR access
Next by Date: [PATCH 06/18] target/riscv: Use 'bool' type for read_only
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 03/18] target/riscv: gdbstub: Minor change for better readability
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 05/18] target/riscv: Coding style fixes in csr.c
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread