[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v9 4/6] s390x/ap: base Adjunct Processor (AP) ob

From: Halil Pasic
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH v9 4/6] s390x/ap: base Adjunct Processor (AP) object model
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 16:22:12 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1

On 09/27/2018 02:29 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> +static void vfio_ap_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>> +{
>> +    BusClass *k = BUS_CLASS(klass);
> I think calling the variable "oc" (or something similar) instead of
> "klass" is prefered nowadays.
>> +    k->get_dev_path = vfio_ap_bus_get_dev_path;
>> +    /* More than one vfio-ap device does not make sense */
>> +    k->max_dev = 1;
> Would it make sense to set a DEVICE_CATEGORY here, too?

It would be 
set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_MISC, dc->categories);
I guess.

People seem to do this, but I'm not sure what is the actual impact of having
DEVICE_CATEGORY_MISC set or not set, except for vfio_ap being listed as misc
or uncategorized device respectively. Currently we have loader and vfio-ap
uncategorized. Should loader become MISC too?

>> +}

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]