[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/s390x: Fix LGPL version in
Re: [qemu-s390x] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] target/s390x: Fix LGPL version in the file header comments
Tue, 29 Jan 2019 16:05:41 +0100
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0
On 1/29/19 2:51 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:37:47 +0100
> Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
>> It's either "GNU *Library* General Public License version 2" or
>> "GNU Lesser General Public License version *2.1*", but there was
>> no "version 2.0" of the "Lesser" license. So assume that version
>> 2.1 is meant here.
> I think we can assume that.
> Given that there have been several of these cases (and that there's a
> lot of boilerplate in general): Should we adopt SPDX license
> identifiers for QEMU, as the Linux kernel did? They also discovered and
> fixed some problems/oddities while at it.
This might be cheaper than adding checkpatch rules to parse current
licenses to avoid miswritten one coming back...
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
>> target/s390x/cc_helper.c | 2 +-
>> target/s390x/excp_helper.c | 2 +-
>> target/s390x/fpu_helper.c | 2 +-
>> target/s390x/gdbstub.c | 2 +-
>> target/s390x/helper.c | 2 +-
>> target/s390x/int_helper.c | 2 +-
>> target/s390x/mem_helper.c | 2 +-
>> target/s390x/misc_helper.c | 2 +-
>> target/s390x/translate.c | 2 +-
>> 9 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> Is this going through the trivial tree? If so,
> Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
> I can also take this through the s390x tree.