qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH 06/15] s390-bios: Clean up cio.h


From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [qemu-s390x] [PATCH 06/15] s390-bios: Clean up cio.h
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 13:32:06 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1

On 2019-02-04 11:48, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 08:29:13 -0500
> "Jason J. Herne" <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> Add proper typedefs to all structs and modify all bit fields to use 
>> consistent
>> formatting.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jason J. Herne <address@hidden>
>> Reviewed-by: Collin Walling <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h      | 86 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>  pc-bios/s390-ccw/s390-ccw.h |  8 -----
>>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h
>> index 1a0795f..a48eee5 100644
>> --- a/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h
>> +++ b/pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h
>> @@ -53,12 +53,12 @@ struct schib_config {
>>      __u64 mba;
>>      __u32 intparm;
>>      __u16 mbi;
>> -    __u32 isc:3;
>> -    __u32 ena:1;
>> -    __u32 mme:2;
>> -    __u32 mp:1;
>> -    __u32 csense:1;
>> -    __u32 mbfc:1;
>> +    __u32 isc    : 3;
>> +    __u32 ena    : 1;
>> +    __u32 mme    : 2;
>> +    __u32 mp     : 1;
>> +    __u32 csense : 1;
>> +    __u32 mbfc   : 1;
>>  } __attribute__ ((packed));
> 
> This seems to make checkpatch unhappy... maybe consolidate to the other
> formatting instead?

Yeah, you get lots of these errors this way:

ERROR: spaces prohibited around that ':' (ctx:WxW)
#141: FILE: pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h:56:
+    __u32 isc    : 3;
                  ^

ERROR: spaces prohibited around that ':' (ctx:WxW)
#142: FILE: pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h:57:
+    __u32 ena    : 1;
                  ^

ERROR: spaces prohibited around that ':' (ctx:WxW)
#143: FILE: pc-bios/s390-ccw/cio.h:58:
+    __u32 mme    : 2;
                  ^
...

Not sure whether it's a checkpatch warning or really our official coding
style, but anyway, I'd rather prefer to keep checkpatch calm here and
thus no spaces around the ':' please.

 Thomas




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]