qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] s390x: Add missing vcpu reset functions


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] s390x: Add missing vcpu reset functions
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 16:35:30 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1

On 04.12.19 16:33, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2019 16:08:48 +0100
> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> On 04.12.19 16:07, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> On 04.12.19 15:59, Cornelia Huck wrote:  
>>>> On Tue,  3 Dec 2019 08:28:11 -0500
>>>> Janosch Frank <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>>> Up to now we only had an ioctl to reset vcpu data QEMU couldn't reach
>>>>> for the initial reset, and that was also called for the clear
>>>>> reset. To be architecture compliant, we also need to clear local
>>>>> interrupts on a normal reset.  
>>>>
>>>> Do we also need to do something like that for tcg? David?
>>>>  
>>>
>>> So, we have
>>>
>>> /* Fields up to this point are not cleared by initial CPU reset */
>>> struct {} start_initial_reset_fields;
>>> [...]
>>> int pending_int
>>> uint16_t external_call_addr;
>>> DECLARE_BITMAP(emergency_signals, S390_MAX_CPUS);
>>> [...]
>>> /* Fields up to this point are cleared by a CPU reset */
>>> struct {} end_reset_fields;
>>>
>>> This means, local interrupts will be cleared by everything that zeroes
>>> "start_initial_reset_fields->end_reset_fields"
>>>
>>> So, they will get cleared by S390_CPU_RESET_INITIAL only if I am not
>>> wrong. In order to clear them on S390_CPU_RESET_NORMAL, we have to
>>> manually set them to zero.  
>>
>> Sorry, by S390_CPU_RESET_INITIAL and S390_CPU_RESET_CLEAR.
> 
> Ok. Will you cook up a patch, or should I do it?
> 

If you want to have some TCG fun, feel free. Otherwise, let me know :)

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]