[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v6 0/8] s390: Extended-Length SCCB & DIAGNOSE 0x318 |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:18:55 +0200 |
On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:13:49 -0400
Collin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 9/16/20 1:15 PM, Collin Walling wrote:
> > On 9/16/20 11:53 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>>
> >>
> >> Thanks, applied.
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Thanks Conny.
> >
> > Much appreciated for everyone's patience and review. The only thing I'd
> > like to hold out on for now is for someone to take a peek at patch #3
> > with respect to the protected virtualization stuff. I don't know too
> > much about it, honestly, and I want to ensure that dynamically
> > allocating memory for the SCCB makes sense there. The alternative would
> > be to allocate a static 4K for the work_sccb.
> >
>
> I had someone take a look at the patch for PV and was told everything
> looks sane. Since the patches have already been applied, it seems like
> it's too late to add a reviewed-by from someone?
Have the reviewer reply with their R-b, and I'll happily add it, as I
rebase s390-next before doing a pull req anyway :)
>
> Either way: thanks to everyone for the journey on getting these patches
> through!
>
- Re: [PATCH v6 7/8] s390/kvm: header sync for diag318, (continued)