[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PULL 07/20] s390x/tcg: fix ignoring bit 63 when setting the storage key

From: Thomas Huth
Subject: [PULL 07/20] s390x/tcg: fix ignoring bit 63 when setting the storage key in SSKE
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 15:14:36 +0200

From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

Right now we could set an 8-bit storage key via SSKE and retrieve it
again via ISKE, which is against the architecture description:

The new seven-bit storage-key value, or selected bits
thereof, is obtained from bit positions 56-62 of gen-
eral register R 1 . The contents of bit positions 0-55
and 63 of the register are ignored.

The seven-bit storage key is inserted in bit positions
56-62 of general register R 1 , and bit 63 is set to zero.

Let's properly ignore bit 63 to create the correct seven-bit storage key.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20210903155514.44772-3-david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
 target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c b/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c
index e0befd0f03..3c0820dd74 100644
--- a/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c
+++ b/target/s390x/tcg/mem_helper.c
@@ -2210,7 +2210,7 @@ void HELPER(sske)(CPUS390XState *env, uint64_t r1, 
uint64_t r2)
         skeyclass = S390_SKEYS_GET_CLASS(ss);
-    key = (uint8_t) r1;
+    key = r1 & 0xfe;
     skeyclass->set_skeys(ss, addr / TARGET_PAGE_SIZE, 1, &key);
     * As we can only flush by virtual address and not all the entries

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]