Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] target/s390x: Fix SLDA sign bit index

[David Hildenbrand]

On 12.01.22 05:39, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> David Hildenbrand noticed that sign bit index for SLDA is wrong: since
> SLDA operates on 64-bit values, it should be 63, not 31.

Maybe just replace the "David ... noticed" by a Reported-by (below).

> 
> Fixes: a79ba3398a0a ("target-s390: Convert SHIFT DOUBLE")
> Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  target/s390x/tcg/insn-data.def | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/s390x/tcg/insn-data.def b/target/s390x/tcg/insn-data.def
> index f0af458aee..90c753068c 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/tcg/insn-data.def
> +++ b/target/s390x/tcg/insn-data.def
> @@ -800,7 +800,7 @@
>      C(0xebde, SRLK,    RSY_a, DO,  r3_32u, sh32, new, r1_32, srl, 0)
>      C(0xeb0c, SRLG,    RSY_a, Z,   r3_o, sh64, r1, 0, srl, 0)
>  /* SHIFT LEFT DOUBLE */
> -    D(0x8f00, SLDA,    RS_a,  Z,   r1_D32, sh64, new, r1_D32, sla, 0, 31)
> +    D(0x8f00, SLDA,    RS_a,  Z,   r1_D32, sh64, new, r1_D32, sla, 0, 63)
>  /* SHIFT LEFT DOUBLE LOGICAL */
>      C(0x8d00, SLDL,    RS_a,  Z,   r1_D32, sh64, new, r1_D32, sll, 0)
>  /* SHIFT RIGHT DOUBLE */

Reported-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>


Thanks :)

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb