qemu-s390x
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] target/s390x: Fix emulation of C(G)HRL


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] target/s390x: Fix emulation of C(G)HRL
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2023 12:59:36 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1

On 3/6/23 12:55, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
The second operand of COMPARE HALFWORD RELATIVE LONG is a signed
halfword, it does not have the same size as the first operand.

Fixes: a7e836d5eb ("target-s390: Convert COMPARE, COMPARE LOGICAL")
Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
---
  target/s390x/tcg/insn-data.h.inc | 4 ++--
  target/s390x/tcg/translate.c     | 7 +++++++
  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/s390x/tcg/insn-data.h.inc b/target/s390x/tcg/insn-data.h.inc
index 9d2d35f084..6fe8ca5143 100644
--- a/target/s390x/tcg/insn-data.h.inc
+++ b/target/s390x/tcg/insn-data.h.inc
@@ -199,8 +199,8 @@
      C(0xe55c, CHSI,    SIL,   GIE, m1_32s, i2, 0, 0, 0, cmps64)
      C(0xe558, CGHSI,   SIL,   GIE, m1_64, i2, 0, 0, 0, cmps64)
  /* COMPARE HALFWORD RELATIVE LONG */
-    C(0xc605, CHRL,    RIL_b, GIE, r1_o, mri2_32s, 0, 0, 0, cmps32)
-    C(0xc604, CGHRL,   RIL_b, GIE, r1_o, mri2_64, 0, 0, 0, cmps64)
+    C(0xc605, CHRL,    RIL_b, GIE, r1_o, mri2_16s, 0, 0, 0, cmps32)
+    C(0xc604, CGHRL,   RIL_b, GIE, r1_o, mri2_16s, 0, 0, 0, cmps64)
  /* COMPARE HIGH */
      C(0xb9cd, CHHR,    RRE,   HW,  r1_sr32, r2_sr32, 0, 0, 0, cmps32)
      C(0xb9dd, CHLR,    RRE,   HW,  r1_sr32, r2_o, 0, 0, 0, cmps32)
diff --git a/target/s390x/tcg/translate.c b/target/s390x/tcg/translate.c
index 811049ea28..60b1254bb2 100644
--- a/target/s390x/tcg/translate.c
+++ b/target/s390x/tcg/translate.c
@@ -5974,6 +5974,13 @@ static void in2_m2_64a(DisasContext *s, DisasOps *o)
  #define SPEC_in2_m2_64a 0
  #endif
+static void in2_mri2_16s(DisasContext *s, DisasOps *o)
+{
+    in2_ri2(s, o);
+    tcg_gen_qemu_ld16s(o->in2, o->in2, get_mem_index(s));
+}
+#define SPEC_in2_mri2_16s 0

This is incorrect.  See

https://patchew.org/QEMU/20230227054233.390271-1-richard.henderson@linaro.org/20230227054233.390271-51-richard.henderson@linaro.org/


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]