qemu-stable
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] hw/rdma: modify struct initia


From: Marcel Apfelbaum
Subject: Re: [Qemu-stable] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] hw/rdma: modify struct initialization
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 23:23:50 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.1



On 1/13/19 9:36 PM, Yuval Shaia wrote:
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 09:24:40PM +0200, Yuval Shaia wrote:
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 05:02:24PM +0200, Marcel Apfelbaum wrote:
Do not initialize structs with {0} since some
CLANG versions do not support it.

Use memset instead.
It is easier than patching CLANG ha? :)

Signed-off-by: Marcel Apfelbaum <address@hidden>
---
  contrib/rdmacm-mux/main.c | 12 +++++++++---
  hw/rdma/rdma_backend.c    | 16 ++++++++++++----
  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/rdmacm-mux/main.c b/contrib/rdmacm-mux/main.c
index 64676030c5..d01dc76927 100644
--- a/contrib/rdmacm-mux/main.c
+++ b/contrib/rdmacm-mux/main.c
@@ -350,9 +350,11 @@ static int get_fd(const char *mad, int *fd, __be64 
*gid_ifid)
  static void *umad_recv_thread_func(void *args)
  {
      int rc;
-    RdmaCmMuxMsg msg = {0};
+    RdmaCmMuxMsg msg;
      int fd = -2;
+ memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
+
      msg.hdr.msg_type = RDMACM_MUX_MSG_TYPE_REQ;
      msg.hdr.op_code = RDMACM_MUX_OP_CODE_MAD;
@@ -387,11 +389,13 @@ static void *umad_recv_thread_func(void *args)
  static int read_and_process(int fd)
  {
      int rc;
-    RdmaCmMuxMsg msg = {0};
+    RdmaCmMuxMsg msg;
      struct umad_hdr *hdr;
      uint32_t *comm_id = 0;
      uint16_t attr_id;
+ memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
+
      rc = recv(fd, &msg, sizeof(msg), 0);
      syslog(LOG_DEBUG, "Socket %d, recv %d\n", fd, rc);
@@ -744,7 +748,9 @@ static void signal_handler(int sig, siginfo_t *siginfo, void *context)
  static int init(void)
  {
      int rc;
-    struct sigaction sig = {0};
+    struct sigaction sig;
+
+    memset(&sig, 0, sizeof(sig));
rc = init_listener();
      if (rc) {
diff --git a/hw/rdma/rdma_backend.c b/hw/rdma/rdma_backend.c
index c28bfbd44d..92e95aa640 100644
--- a/hw/rdma/rdma_backend.c
+++ b/hw/rdma/rdma_backend.c
@@ -190,9 +190,11 @@ static inline int 
rdmacm_mux_can_process_async(RdmaBackendDev *backend_dev)
static int check_mux_op_status(CharBackend *mad_chr_be)
  {
-    RdmaCmMuxMsg msg = {0};
+    RdmaCmMuxMsg msg;
      int ret;
+ memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
+
      pr_dbg("Reading response\n");
      ret = qemu_chr_fe_read_all(mad_chr_be, (uint8_t *)&msg, sizeof(msg));
      if (ret != sizeof(msg)) {
@@ -387,10 +389,12 @@ static int build_host_sge_array(RdmaDeviceResources 
*rdma_dev_res,
  static int mad_send(RdmaBackendDev *backend_dev, uint8_t sgid_idx,
                      union ibv_gid *sgid, struct ibv_sge *sge, uint32_t 
num_sge)
  {
-    RdmaCmMuxMsg msg = {0};
+    RdmaCmMuxMsg msg;
      char *hdr, *data;
      int ret;
+ memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
+
      pr_dbg("num_sge=%d\n", num_sge);
if (num_sge != 2) {
@@ -1112,9 +1116,11 @@ int rdma_backend_get_gid_index(RdmaBackendDev 
*backend_dev,
  int rdma_backend_add_gid(RdmaBackendDev *backend_dev, const char *ifname,
                           union ibv_gid *gid)
  {
-    RdmaCmMuxMsg msg = {0};
+    RdmaCmMuxMsg msg;
      int ret;
+ memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
+
      pr_dbg("0x%llx, 0x%llx\n",
             (long long unsigned int)be64_to_cpu(gid->global.subnet_prefix),
             (long long unsigned int)be64_to_cpu(gid->global.interface_id));
@@ -1138,9 +1144,11 @@ int rdma_backend_add_gid(RdmaBackendDev *backend_dev, 
const char *ifname,
  int rdma_backend_del_gid(RdmaBackendDev *backend_dev, const char *ifname,
                           union ibv_gid *gid)
  {
-    RdmaCmMuxMsg msg = {0};
+    RdmaCmMuxMsg msg;
      int ret;
+ memset(&msg, 0, sizeof(msg));
+
      pr_dbg("0x%llx, 0x%llx\n",
             (long long unsigned int)be64_to_cpu(gid->global.subnet_prefix),
             (long long unsigned int)be64_to_cpu(gid->global.interface_id));
Reviewed-by: Yuval Shaia <address@hidden>

One comment though, should subject prefixed with hw/rdma or
contrib/rdmacm-mux?
Just noticed that patch took care of both so would it be better to have two
separate patches instead?

Since is an almost trivial commit I didn't bother... I hope is ok.

Thanks,
Marcel


--
2.17.1





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]