[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] tests/vm: Update haiku test vm to R1/Beta3

From: Thomas Huth
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/vm: Update haiku test vm to R1/Beta3
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:15:16 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0

On 16/02/2022 19.12, Alexander von Gluck IV wrote:
February 16, 2022 10:26 AM, "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
On 16/02/2022 16.42, Alexander von Gluck IV wrote:

tests/vm/haiku.x86_64 | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/vm/haiku.x86_64 b/tests/vm/haiku.x86_64
index 2eb736dae1..936f7d2ae2 100755
--- a/tests/vm/haiku.x86_64
+++ b/tests/vm/haiku.x86_64
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
# Haiku VM image
-# Copyright 2020 Haiku, Inc.
+# Copyright 2020-2022 Haiku, Inc.
# Authors:
# Alexander von Gluck IV <kallisti5@unixzen.com>
@@ -48,8 +48,8 @@ class HaikuVM(basevm.BaseVM):
name = "haiku"
arch = "x86_64"
- link =
- csum = "41c38b316e0cbdbc66b5dbaf3612b866700a4f35807cb1eb266a5bf83e9e68d5"
+ link =
+ csum = "e67d4aacbcc687013d5cc91990ddd86cc5d70a5d28432ae2691944f8ce5d5041"
poweroff = "shutdown"
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ class HaikuVM(basevm.BaseVM):
self.print_step("Extracting disk image")
- subprocess.check_call(["tar", "xzf", tarball, "./box.img", "-O"],
+ subprocess.check_call(["tar", "xzf", tarball, "box.img", "-O"],
stdout=open(img, 'wb'))
self.print_step("Preparing disk image")

Thank you very much for the quick fix, that indeed helps to compile-test Haiku 
again! (the unit
tests are failing, though, but IIRC that was already the case before)

Tested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>


Sorry for forgetting about it.   I hand release Vagrant images for Haiku after 
major releases
and generally forget to update them until ~6 months after a major release as 
there aren't many users.

I don't have commit access to qemu so will need someone else to push when the 
time comes.


I think this could either go through the qemu-trivial tree, or I can pick it up and take it through my "testing" tree.

But I just noticed that your patch lacks the "Signed-off-by" line ... so for the records (it's required for the rules, see https://www.qemu.org/docs/master/devel/submitting-a-patch.html#patch-emails-must-include-a-signed-off-by-line ) could you either please reply with a "Signed-off-by" line to your original patch, or repost the whole patch as a v2 with the S-o-b included? Thanks!


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]