[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qsos-commits] qsos/apps/tpl-xuleditor/chrome/content global.xml
From: |
Raphaël Semeteys |
Subject: |
[Qsos-commits] qsos/apps/tpl-xuleditor/chrome/content global.xml |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Nov 2006 14:16:13 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /sources/qsos
Module name: qsos
Changes by: Raphaël Semeteys <rsemeteys> 06/11/03 14:16:13
Modified files:
apps/tpl-xuleditor/chrome/content: global.xml
Log message:
include instead of entire generic section
CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/qsos/apps/tpl-xuleditor/chrome/content/global.xml?cvsroot=qsos&r1=1.2&r2=1.3
Patches:
Index: global.xml
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/qsos/qsos/apps/tpl-xuleditor/chrome/content/global.xml,v
retrieving revision 1.2
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -b -r1.2 -r1.3
--- global.xml 7 May 2006 12:08:00 -0000 1.2
+++ global.xml 3 Nov 2006 14:16:13 -0000 1.3
@@ -19,361 +19,5 @@
<qsosappfamily></qsosappfamily>
<qsosspecificformat></qsosspecificformat>
</header>
- <section name="generic" title="Generic section">
- <desc>Generic criteria from QSOS version 1.6</desc>
- <element name="intrinsicdurability" title="Intrinsic durability">
- <desc>Intrinsic durability</desc>
- <element name="maturity" title="Maturity">
- <desc>Maturity</desc>
- <element name="age" title="Age">
- <desc0>less than 3 months</desc0>
- <desc1>if between 3 months and 3 years</desc1>
- <desc2>after 3 years</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="stability" title="Stability">
- <desc0>Unstable software with numerous releases or patches
generating side effects</desc0>
- <desc1>Stabilized production release existing but old. Difficulties
to stabilize developpement releases</desc1>
- <desc2>Stabilized software. Releases provide bug fixes corrections
but mainly new functionalities</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="historyknowproblems" title="History, know problems">
- <desc0>Software knows several problems which can be
prohibitive</desc0>
- <desc1>No know major problem or crisis</desc1>
- <desc2>History of good management of crisis situations</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="forkprobability" title="Fork probability, source of
Forking">
- <desc0>Software is very likely to be forked in the future</desc0>
- <desc1>Software comes from a fork but has very few chances of being
forked in the future</desc1>
- <desc2>Software has very little chance of being forked. It does not
come from a fork either</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="adoption" title="Adoption">
- <desc>Adoption by community and industry</desc>
- <element name="popularity" title="Popularity (related to: general
public, niche, ...)">
- <desc0>Very few users identified</desc0>
- <desc1>Detectable use on Internet</desc1>
- <desc2>Numerous users, numerous references</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="references" title="References">
- <desc0>None</desc0>
- <desc1>Few refences, non critical usages</desc1>
- <desc2>Often implemented for critical applications</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="contributingcommunity" title="Contributing Community">
- <desc0>No community or without real activity (forum, mailing list,
...)</desc0>
- <desc1>Existing community with a notable activity</desc1>
- <desc2>Strong community: big activity on forums, numerous
contributors and advocates</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="books" title="books">
- <desc0>No book about the software</desc0>
- <desc1>Less than 5 books about the software are available</desc1>
- <desc2>More than 5 books about software are available, in several
languages</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="developmentleadership" title="Development leadership">
- <desc>Organisation and leadership of developments</desc>
- <element name="leadingteam" title="Leading team">
- <desc0>1 to 2 individuals involved, not clearly identified</desc0>
- <desc1>Between 2 and 5 independent people</desc1>
- <desc2>More than 5 people</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="managementstyle" title="Management style">
- <desc0>Complete dictatorship</desc0>
- <desc1>Enlightened despotism</desc1>
- <desc2>Council of architects with identified leader (e.g:
KDE)</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="activity" title="Activity">
- <desc>Activity of the project and around the software</desc>
- <element name="developersidentificationturnover" title="Developers,
identification, turnover">
- <desc0>Less than 3 developers, not clearly identified</desc0>
- <desc1>Between 4 and 7 developers, or more unidentified developers
with important turnover</desc1>
- <desc2>More than 7 developers, very stable team</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="activityonbugs" title="Activity on bugs">
- <desc0>Slow reactivity in forum or on mailing list, or nothing
regarding bug fixes in releases note</desc0>
- <desc1>Detectable activity but without process clearly exposed,
loing reaction/resolution time</desc1>
- <desc2>Strong reactivity based on roles and tasks assignment</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="activityonfunctionalities" title="Activity on
functionalities">
- <desc0>No or few new functionalities</desc0>
- <desc1>Evolution of the product driven by the core team or by user's
request without any clearly explained process</desc1>
- <desc2>Tool(s) to manage feature requests, strong interaction with
roadmap</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="activityonreleases" title="Activity on releases">
- <desc0>Very weak activity on both production and development
releases</desc0>
- <desc1>Activity on production and developmenet releases. Frequent
minor releases (bug fixes)</desc1>
- <desc2>Important activity with frequent minor releases (bugs fixes)
and planned major releases relating to the roadmap forcast</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="industrializedsolution" title="Industrialized solution">
- <desc>Industrialization level of the project</desc>
- <element name="independenceofdevelopments" title="Independence of
developments">
- <desc0>Developments realized at 100% by employees of a single
company</desc0>
- <desc1>60% maximum</desc1>
- <desc2>20% maximum</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="services" title="Services">
- <desc>Services offering</desc>
- <element name="training" title="Training">
- <desc0>No offer of training identified</desc0>
- <desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
- <desc2>Rich offers provided by several contractors, in serveral
languages and split into modules of gradual levels</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="support" title="Support">
- <desc0>No offer of support except via public forums and mailing
lists</desc0>
- <desc1>Offer exists but is provided by a single contractor without
strong commitment quality of services</desc1>
- <desc2>Multiple service providers with strong commitment (e.g:
guaranteed resolution time)</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="consulting" title="Consulting">
- <desc0>No offer of consulting service</desc0>
- <desc1>Offer exists but is restricted geographically and to one
language or is provided by a single contractor</desc1>
- <desc2>Consulting services provided by different contractors in
serveral languages</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="documentation" title="Documentation">
- <desc0>No user documentation</desc0>
- <desc1>Documentation exists but shifted in time, is restricted to one
language or is poorly detailed</desc1>
- <desc2>Documentation always up to date, translated and possibly
adapted to different target readers (end user, sysadmin, manager, ...)</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="qualityassurance" title="Quality Assurance">
- <desc>Quality assurance process</desc>
- <element name="quality" title="Quality Assurance">
- <desc0>No QA process</desc0>
- <desc1>Identifies QA process but not much formalized and with no
tool</desc1>
- <desc2>Automatic testing process included in code's life-cycle with
publication of results</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="tools" title="Tools">
- <desc0>No bug or feature request management tool</desc0>
- <desc1>Standard tools provided (for instance by a hosting forge) but
poorly used</desc1>
- <desc2>Very active use of tools for roles/tasks allocation and
progress monitoring</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="packaging" title="Packaging">
- <desc>Packaging for various operating systems</desc>
- <element name="packagingsource" title="Source">
- <desc0>Software can't be installed from source without lot of
work</desc0>
- <desc1>Installation from source is limited and depends on very
strict conditions (OS, arch, lib, ...)</desc1>
- <desc2>Installation from source is easy</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingdebian" title="Debian">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for Debian</desc0>
- <desc1>A Debian package exists but it has important issues or it
doesn't have official support</desc1>
- <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingfreebsd" title="FreeBSD">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for FreeBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
- <desc2>A official port exists in FreeBSD</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="packaginghpux" title="HP-UX">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for HP-UX</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
- <desc2>A stable package is provided for HP-UX</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingmacosx" title="MacOSX">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for MacOSX</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
- <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingmandriva" title="Mandriva">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for Mandriva</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
- <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingnet" title="NetBSD">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for NetBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
- <desc2>A official port exists in NetBSD</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingopen" title="OpenBSD">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for OpenBSD</desc0>
- <desc1>A port exists but it has important issues or it doesn't have
official support</desc1>
- <desc2>A official port exists in OpenBSD</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingredhat" title="RedHat">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for RedHat/Fedora</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
- <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingsolaris" title="Solaris">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for Solaris</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support (e.g: SunFreeware.com )</desc1>
- <desc2>The software is supported by Sun for Solaris</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingsuse" title="SuSE">
- <desc0>The software is not packaged for SuSE</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it has important issues or it doesn't
have official support</desc1>
- <desc2>The software is packaged in the distribution</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="packagingwindows" title="Windows">
- <desc0>The project can't be installed on Windows</desc0>
- <desc1>A package exists but it is limited or has important issues or
just cover some specific Windows release (e.g: Windows2000 and
WindowsXP)</desc1>
- <desc2>Windows is full supported and a package is provided</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="exploitability" title="Exploitability">
- <desc>Exploitability level</desc>
- <element name="easeofuseergonomics" title="Ease of use, ergonomics">
- <desc0>Difficult to use, requires an in depth knowledge of the
software functionality</desc0>
- <desc1>Austere and very technical ergonomics</desc1>
- <desc2>GUI including help functions and elaborated ergonomics</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="administrationmonitoring" title="Administration /
Monitoring">
- <desc0>No administrative or monitoring functionalities</desc0>
- <desc1>Existing, functionalities but uncomplete and or need
improvement</desc1>
- <desc2>Complete and easy-to-use administration and monitoring
functionalities. Possible integration with external tools (e.g: SNMP, syslog,
...)</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="technicaladaptability" title="Technical adaptability">
- <desc>Technical adaptability</desc>
- <element name="modularity" title="Modularity">
- <desc0>Monolithic software</desc0>
- <desc1>Presence of hight level modules allowing a first level of
software adaptation</desc1>
- <desc2>Modular conception, allowing easy adaptation of the software by
selecting or creating modules</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="codemodification" title="Code modification">
- <desc0>Everything by hand</desc0>
- <desc1>Recompilation possible but complex without any tools or
documentation</desc1>
- <desc2>Recompilation with tools (e.g: make, ANT, ...) and
documentation provided</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="codeextension" title="Code extention">
- <desc0>Any modification requires code recompilation</desc0>
- <desc1>Architecture designed for static extension but requires
recompilation</desc1>
- <desc2>Principle of plugin, architecture designed for dynamic
extension without recompilation</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="strategy" title="Strategy">
- <desc>Project's strategy</desc>
- <element name="license" title="License">
- <desc>License</desc>
- <element name="permissiveness" title="Permissiveness (only if user
wants to become owner of code)">
- <desc0>Very strict license, like GPL</desc0>
- <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD) dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activities</desc1>
- <desc2>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="protectionagainstproprietaryforks" title="Protection
against proprietary forks">
- <desc0>Very permissive like BSD or Apache licenses</desc0>
- <desc1>Moderate permissive license located between both extremes
(GPL and BSD), dual-licensing depending on the type of user (person, company,
...) or their activies</desc1>
- <desc2>Very strict license, like GPL</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- <element name="copyrightowners" title="Copyright owners">
- <desc0>Rights held by a few individuals or entities, making it easier
to change the license</desc0>
- <desc1>Rights held by numerous individuals owning the code in a
homogeneous way, making relicense very difficult</desc1>
- <desc2>Rights held by a legal entity in whom the community trusts
(e.g: FSF or ASF)</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="modificationofsourcecode" title="Modification of source
code">
- <desc0>No pratical way to propose code modification</desc0>
- <desc1>Tools provided to access and modify code (like CVS or SVN) but
not really used to develop the software</desc1>
- <desc2>The code modification process is well defined, exposed and
respected, based on roles assignment</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="roadmap" title="Roadmap">
- <desc0>No published roadmap</desc0>
- <desc1>Existing roadmap without planning</desc1>
- <desc2>Versionned roadmap, with planning and measure of delays</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="sponsor" title="Sponsor">
- <desc0>Software has no sponsor, the core team is not paid</desc0>
- <desc1>Software has an unique sponsor who might determine its
strategy</desc1>
- <desc2>Software is sponsored by industry</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- <element name="strategicalindependence" title="Strategical independence">
- <desc0>No detectable strategy or strong dependency on one unique actor
(person, company, sponsor)</desc0>
- <desc1>Strategical vision shared with several other free and open
source projects but without strong commitment from copyrights owners</desc1>
- <desc2>Strong independence of the code team, legal entity holding
rights, strong involvement in the standardization process</desc2>
- <score></score>
- <comment></comment>
- </element>
- </element>
- </section>
+ <include section="generic"/>
</document>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Qsos-commits] qsos/apps/tpl-xuleditor/chrome/content global.xml,
Raphaël Semeteys <=