[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Gitea assessment: C5

From: David Seaward
Subject: Re: [Repo-criteria-discuss] Gitea assessment: C5
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 01:25:49 +0200


> Regarding C5 (Recommends and encourages GPL 3-or-later licensing
> at least as much as any other kind of licensing), when creating a
> new repo...

Just to follow up on this. I couldn't find a more definitive definition
of the C5 criteria. Am I missing something? (This is the last
outstanding issue in this evaluation so I'm keen to resolve it.)

Potential issues are 1) license choice is empty-by-default (but all
licenses listed equally) and 2) picking GPL-3.0 adds license text to a
new repo but no explicit choice between "only" and "or-later" (not sure
if this is an overly strict analysis, or de facto standard, and
accepted, behaviour).


P.S. This follows on from

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]