Re: One shouldn't mix different kinds of requirements to the software into a single score

[Mike Gerwitz]

On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 09:39:43 -0500, Ian Kelling wrote:
> KOLANICH <address@hidden> writes:

[...]

>> It is because 1-3 are extremily important, but differently for each
>> individual, 4 is very important, 5 is unimportant and 6 is highky
>> controversal.
>
> I don't agree with your assessment of what is important, and I don't
> think it would make sense to further complicate the system in much of
> any way, much less axes.

Also, these criteria were developed for GNU.  If it's useful to others,
great!  But the criteria reflect GNU's perspective and priorities, and
so there are certainly expected to be disagreements when applied in
other contexts.

> My main concern is that we are missing
> evaluations of notabug.io, pagure.io, sr.ht, codeberg.org and that
> gitlab.com is out of date. I intend to work on completing those in the
> coming weeks.

This is excellent news.  Thank you!

-- 
Mike Gerwitz

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature