Re: RFC: criteria A4 should be a C-class criteria

[bill-auger]

this is not about A4 at all - i confused the issue by mentioning
it - i should not have mentioned A4 at all - please read the
followup - both aaron an i believe that this is important
enough to investigate

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2021-03/msg00018.html

On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:31:22 -0500 bill-auger wrote:
> i realize now, why my proposal was misunderstood - i should not
> have suggested removing A4 - C7 has a very different meaning -
> perhaps i could have worded it better - A4 could remain without
> redundancy or conflict with C7; and it has value of it own
> 
>   A4 is: "Does not permit nonfree licenses"
>   C7 is: "Does not offer public downloads of unlicensed works"