[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH]: criteria C5

From: bill-auger
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: criteria C5
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 22:34:45 -0400

On Sun, 27 Jun 2021 20:32:21 -0400 Richard wrote:
> The negation makes this harder to understand (for people not
> accustomed to set theory and complex grammar), so we should not
> make this change.

as i remember, this was proposed because people expressed a
confusion of its intention - it is presuming that the forge
recommends _any_ license at all - people thought that it implied
that the forge must recommend the GPL - the re-wording was
supposed to be a clarification, such as: "... IFF the forge
recommends any license ..."

the proposed B1.9 requires good licensing documentation - even
if that is accepted though, this criteria is at the 'C' level,
yet is essentially taking for granted that B1.9 is satisfied

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]