[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rule-list] Installing RPM without docs
From: |
Michael Fratoni |
Subject: |
Re: [Rule-list] Installing RPM without docs |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Jun 2002 23:06:27 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.4.1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 03 June 2002 05:15 pm, Martin Stricker wrote:
> Sounds good. One maybe quite stupid addition: I don't know what RPM
> throws out as docs when told so. If it even trashes the man and info
> pages there should be three options:
> What do you want to to about software documentation? [default
> "recommended"]
> 1) Remove it completely. Warning: There won't even man pages be left!
> 2) Recommended usage: Keep only man and info pages.
> 3) Keep all the documentation.
I agree, Martin. We'll need to look into it more and see the best way to
handle it. For a new user, leaving out all documentation could be a bad
choice.
I haven't tried it yet, but I would assume the --excludedocs flag would
leave out all files listed by 'rpm -qd packagename'. This would include
man pages, info, and /usr/share/docs/ files.
However, in situations where disk space is tight, it's nice to have
options. On my test machine, (base install plus network tools), I just
removed /usr/share/doc/* for a space gain of ~23M.
To get a minimal install onto a test laptop with an 80M drive, I had to
remove all documentation, a good number of kernel modules, most of the
glibc language data, zone info, etc. With an 8M swap partition, I was
able to get a very basic system working, and still have a whopping 6M of
drive space free. :)
- --
- -Michael
pgp key: http://www.tuxfan.homeip.net:8080/gpgkey.txt
Red Hat Linux 7.2 in 8M of RAM: http://www.rule-project.org/
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAjz8LrMACgkQn/07WoAb/SsEBQCeI79s7KeIOr35DzQZ3W9Sa3C7
O3QAn14BGPwnVzgHqD0EMBIMGNqunvzo
=C3T+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----