[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah TODO
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
[Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah TODO |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:07:20 -0500 |
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/administration
Module name: administration
Branch:
Changes by: Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden> 05/01/26 18:07:20
Modified files:
docs/hacking_savannah: TODO
Log message:
*** empty log message ***
CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/administration/administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO.diff?tr1=1.3&tr2=1.4&r1=text&r2=text
Patches:
Index: administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO
diff -u administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO:1.3
administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO:1.4
--- administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO:1.3 Wed Dec 8 23:36:26 2004
+++ administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO Wed Jan 26 18:07:20 2005
@@ -62,3 +62,15 @@
This poses no problem at all, since they don't say you have to remove
the trademarks under any condition.
+
+
+
+<Beuc> zeus: btw, I think it is not of our competence to look at non-obvious
patent issues like the "Dijkstra algorithm"
+<Beuc> incidentally I think it is a simple algorithm that I learnt at school
+<zeus> yes, it isn't of our competence, but IMHO it is of our competence know
if that algorithm it's licensed or not
+<zeus> Beuc: hehe, I know nothing about that algorithm, that's why I ask him
+<Beuc> zeus: for consistency, we should then study if all patented algorithm
are licensed to be used in free software...
+<zeus> Beuc: I'll be more carefully about that point
+
+
+http://fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-10-20-01.en.html
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah TODO,
Sylvain Beucler <=