[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah TODO
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
[Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah TODO |
Date: |
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 07:37:54 -0500 |
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/administration
Module name: administration
Branch:
Changes by: Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden> 05/02/13 12:37:53
Modified files:
docs/hacking_savannah: TODO
Log message:
*** empty log message ***
CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/administration/administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO.diff?tr1=1.4&tr2=1.5&r1=text&r2=text
Patches:
Index: administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO
diff -u administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO:1.4
administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO:1.5
--- administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO:1.4 Wed Jan 26 18:07:20 2005
+++ administration/docs/hacking_savannah/TODO Sun Feb 13 12:37:51 2005
@@ -72,5 +72,22 @@
<Beuc> zeus: for consistency, we should then study if all patented algorithm
are licensed to be used in free software...
<zeus> Beuc: I'll be more carefully about that point
+---
+Mention this article (part of the Savannah philosophy)
http://fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-10-20-01.en.html
+
+---
+
+Hi Beuc,
+
+There's a submitted project called 'tim' that works with MSN and ICQ
+AFAIK MSN it's a non-free protocol (don't know if ICQ is), there's any
+problem in host projects that will use non-free protocols? Can we
+consider this protocol is a proprietary software? IMHO, we should
+promote the use of free IM protocols.
+
+I don't think there is any problem with reverse-engineering non-free
+protocols, as done in Gaim/aMSN/etc.
+
+You still can mention Jabber to the developers.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Savannah-cvs] administration/docs/hacking_savannah TODO,
Sylvain Beucler <=