[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-hackers-public] Re: [gnu.org #334716] Apache logs at lists.gnu
[Savannah-hackers-public] Re: [gnu.org #334716] Apache logs at lists.gnu.org
Fri, 4 May 2007 23:56:24 +0200
Karl planned it all. The procedure is to disable
"respond_to_post_requests" when using "hold" :)
On Fri, May 04, 2007 at 02:57:29PM -0400, Joshua Ginsberg via RT wrote:
> "Hold" generates the same backscatter I believe. Only discard is silent.
> Regardless, if you moderate, then leave it how you like.
> > This is an aside, but as you no doubt know, any automatic notification
> > (whether rejection or whatever) causes backscatter, which in turn is (I
> > believe) a big contributor to why we get blacklists, which in turn is a
> > big pain. Thus I don't think we should ever use reject; discard or hold
> > are the only two useful options (these days) in my experience.
> > Thanks,
|[Prev in Thread]
||[Next in Thread]|
- [Savannah-hackers-public] Re: [gnu.org #334716] Apache logs at lists.gnu.org,
Sylvain Beucler <=