[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GNU/non-GNU distinction

From: Noah Slater
Subject: Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] GNU/non-GNU distinction
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:23:51 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)

On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 05:30:35PM -0600, Karl Berry wrote:
> In addition to what the others wrote ... well, it is simply a
> fundamental distinction.  GNU packages have been accepted as part of
> GNU, and as you know there is a nontrivial process for that.  Non-GNU
> packages have not.  I'm a bit baffled as to why you're asking.

Sorry, in retrospect perhaps I worded my question confusingly.

What I really meant to ask is why is there is a distinction made like this:

I agree that it's an important distinction to make, but I was wondering if it
would make more sense to have everything under and
differentiate using a different set of page templates or similar for GNU.


Noah Slater <>

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]