[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] RE: ForgePlucker

From: Sylvain Beucler
Subject: Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] RE: ForgePlucker
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:28:45 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 01:05:41PM -0500, Karl Berry wrote:
>     source code because of the nature of the license.  How am I supposed
>     to respond to this
> It's not about the "nature of the license".  It's a requirement of
> copyright law that each copyrightable entity -- each source file, in our
> case -- state its license.  And the default is "no permissions are
> granted", so without a license nothing can be done.  (In theory.)
>     referring to the 'New BSD' license is not clear.
> Extremely unclear.  Is there a url?

Here is it - btw he customized the license to use the name of the
project and his name, so the license is unique.

#!/usr/bin/env python

""" -- extract bugtracker state from hosting sites.

usage: [-h] [-u user] [-p password] hostingsite project

State is dumped to standard output in JSON.

This code is Copright (c) 2009 by Eric S. Raymond.  New BSD luicense applies

import sys, os, re, urllib, urllib2, time, calendar


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]