[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Documentation project with other source fi
Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Documentation project with other source files
Sun, 3 Feb 2013 22:35:37 GMT
There's surely no need for a translation to do the licenses any
differently than the original.
Beyond that, there's also no need for .po/examples/etc. to contain the
full text of the FDL. That wouldn't be practical. People have added
pointers to the main license in various ways; anything reasonable is
ok in this regard.
For the license the submitter specified âGNU General Public
License v2 or laterâ, although it is the GFDL.
You should just correct that when you approve it.
Thanks for checking.