[Savannah-hackers-public] Criterion regarding minimum acceptable usefulness/capability of submitted packages

[Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro]

Hello Savannah fellows!

I was somewhat sure I'd sent a message asking about this, but I
didn't receive an answer that I know of, and can't find the
original message in my machine or in this mailing list's archive, so I
guess that that was just a delusion. :-P

Now, straight to the topic, the submission related to the task
#13796[0] consists of basically one Latex template of under 100 lines,
which doesn't appear to me as generally useful.  Is this acceptable
for hosting?  If not, what should I say to the submitter?


Footnotes:

[0] https://savannah.gnu.org/task/?13796

-- 
 88888  FFFFF Bruno Félix Rezende Ribeiro (oitofelix) [0x28D618AF]
 8   8  F     http://oitofelix.freeshell.org/
 88888  FFFF  mailto:address@hidden
 8   8  F     irc://chat.freenode.org/oitofelix
 88888  F     xmpp://address@hidden

- GNU ccd2cue maintainer
- GNU Savannah hacker
- GNU webmaster
- GNU audio and video maintainer
- GNU ethical repository criteria maintainer
- GNU web translation team coordinator (Brazilian Portuguese)
- DMOZ free software editor (Portuguese)
- UFU FAMAT PET member
- SDF Public Access UNIX System ARPA member
- Riseup user and supporter

Please, support my work: http://oitofelix.freeshell.org/funding.html

[GNU DISCLAIMER] I'm a GNU hacker, but my views don't necessarily
match those of the GNU project.  Hereby I express my own opinion,
style and perception, in good faith, aiming the betterment of GNU.

pgpsekUPWjwVn.pgp
Description: Assinatura digital OpenPGP