Re: [Savannah-hackers-public] Delays in mail delivery by gnu.org mailing lists

[Eli Zaretskii]

Here's a message I received from emacs-devel that evidently sat in
some queue in lists,gnu.org for 20 minutes:

  From emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 05 14:18:36 2022
  Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@gnu.org>
  Envelope-to: eliz@gnu.org
  Delivery-date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 14:18:36 -0400
  Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60152)
          by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtps 
(TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
          (Exim 4.90_1)
          (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@gnu.org>)
          id 1og8yF-0008Ew-Ca
          for eliz@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 14:18:32 -0400
  Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]:36440)
          by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
          (Exim 4.90_1)
          (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@gnu.org>)
          id 1og8yE-0006Qk-W5
          for eliz@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 14:18:15 -0400
  Received: from localhost ([::1]:54628 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
          by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
          (envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@gnu.org>)
          id 1og8yE-0007aE-Gs
          for eliz@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 14:18:14 -0400
  Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39968)
   by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
   (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <akrl@sdf.org>) id 1og8fN-0002GH-34
   for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:58:45 -0400
  Received: from mx.sdf.org ([205.166.94.24]:49292)
   by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
   (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <akrl@sdf.org>)
   id 1og8fK-0002Kw-Pk; Wed, 05 Oct 2022 13:58:44 -0400
  Received: from ma.sdf.org (ma.sdf.org [205.166.94.33])
   by mx.sdf.org (8.15.2/8.14.5) with ESMTPS id 295Hwb5K012494
   (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits) verified NO);
   Wed, 5 Oct 2022 17:58:37 GMT
  From: Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org>
  To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
  Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, rlb@defaultvalue.org,
   monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, david@tethera.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org
  Subject: Re: Suppressing native compilation (short and long term)
  In-Reply-To: <87r0zm2qpl.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Wed,
   05 Oct 2022 18:13:58 +0200")
  References: <87bkqxf1ij.fsf@tethera.net> <83sfk6ahty.fsf@gnu.org>
   <jwvh70mgop4.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <8735c6b0wo.fsf@gnus.org>
   <jwvzgeef85c.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87y1ty9lha.fsf@gnus.org>
   <87lepym6ok.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> <877d1i9h7k.fsf@gnus.org>
   <83edvqyr3q.fsf@gnu.org> <874jwl8e4p.fsf@gnus.org>
   <xjfilky76ip.fsf@ma.sdf.org> <87pmf64beo.fsf@gnus.org>
   <xjfwn9e5ouh.fsf@ma.sdf.org> <87h70i4a46.fsf@gnus.org>
   <xjfsfk25ntk.fsf@ma.sdf.org> <87czb648r9.fsf@gnus.org>
   <xjfo7uq5moh.fsf@ma.sdf.org> <874jwi47l6.fsf@gnus.org>
   <87zgea2sgv.fsf@gnus.org> <xjffsg25k00.fsf@ma.sdf.org>
   <87r0zm2qpl.fsf@gnus.org>
  Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2022 17:58:37 +0000
  Message-ID: <xjf1qrm5f02.fsf@ma.sdf.org>
  User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux)
  MIME-Version: 1.0
  Content-Type: text/plain
  Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.166.94.24; envelope-from=akrl@sdf.org;
   helo=mx.sdf.org
  X-Spam_score_int: -18
  X-Spam_score: -1.9
  X-Spam_bar: -
  X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
   SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
  X-Spam_action: no action
  X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
  X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
  Precedence: list
  List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
  List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
   <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
  List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
  List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
  List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
  List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
   <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
  X-Mailman-Copy: yes
  Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@gnu.org
  Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+eliz=gnu.org@gnu.org>
  X-RMAIL-ATTRIBUTES: -D------

  Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

  > Andrea Corallo <akrl@sdf.org> writes:
  >
  >>> (Which reminds me -- one thing I've been pondering for a while is
  >>> whether "emacs -Q" should imply having the JIT off or not.  We use "-Q"
  >>> to get a repeatable Emacs for users, so it would make some sense to have
  >>> -Q now imply `inhibit-automatic-native-compilation'.
  >>
  >> Noooo please!! -Q has just one single clear meaning, let please not add
  >> other implications to it!!  The situation would become very quickly
  >> unmanageable.
  >
  > Yes, that one clear meaning is:
  >
  >               -Q, --quick
  >                       Similar to "-q --no-site-file --no-splash".  Also, 
avoid
  >                       processing X resources.

  Exactly, adding complexity involving the execution engine here is IMO
  just searching for troubles (and having -Q not usable for debugging the
  execution engine itself).  Let's please do not write patches solving
  issues we never encountered or implementing unrequested features.

    Andrea