[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-hackers] Re: exim question
From: |
Loic Dachary |
Subject: |
[Savannah-hackers] Re: exim question |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Mar 2001 21:52:23 +0100 (CET) |
Joel N. Weber II writes:
> My concern was that mail sent *locally to subversions* to a user was
> properly redirected (to the mail address registered in Savannah). Now
> that the Savannah backend scripts update the /etc/aliases file daily,
> this works well.
>
> I'm skeptical that it actually works well. If someone replies to an
> arbitrary message that gets sent out from savannah, does the message
> get to the right place?
No it does not. No mail sent by Savannah is supposed to generate a
reply. There are no mail transactions *to* savannah, only *from*
savannah. When a reply is necessary (first login for instance) a URL
is sent in the mail.
> I think this would be a very good approach. (Make sure you set both
> the envelope from: and the body from:)
>
> Alternatively, you could tell fencepost that it doesn't handle mail
> for savannah.gnu.org (by adjusting fp:/etc/local_mail_domains),
> repoint the MX record for savannah.gnu.org to savannah, and make sure
> that savannah is listening for SMTP connections and forwarding mail
> around appropriately.
>
> I think I favor the former solution, but either strikes me as an
> improvement over the status quo.
True. I also better like the former one. Having one more machine listening
to SMTP is a source or work, I think. I'll look into that when I come back.
Cheers,
--
Loic Dachary http://www.dachary.org/ address@hidden
24 av Secretan http://www.senga.org/ address@hidden
75019 Paris Tel: 33 1 42 45 09 16 address@hidden
GPG Public Key: http://www.dachary.org/loic/gpg.txt