[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Curiosity question, low priority
From: |
Bradley M. Kuhn |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Curiosity question, low priority |
Date: |
Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:08:16 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.24i |
Loic Dachary <address@hidden> wrote:
> Technically speaking it means that natively private projects have
> no passwd file (hence the licensing-qa message) where natively public
> projects have a passwd file (hence the cr-reg message).
>
> This discrepency has no consequence on the privacy of the project
> itself which is enforced by the permission bits at the CVSROOT
> (/cvsroot/licensing-qa and /cvsroot/cr-reg).
>
> Thanks for checking and reporting this. I was not able to say
> immediately that it was normal and I had to check, which is good.
Thanks for your quick reply on something that really wasn't that urgent.
;)
This all sounds fine to me, but it would be useful if this were documented
somewhere. Is there a section yet in the savannah docs about "private
projects"?
-- bkuhn
pgpXsenplwPXP.pgp
Description: PGP signature