[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Requesting help on Savannah?
From: |
Hugo Gayosso |
Subject: |
Re: [Savannah-hackers] Requesting help on Savannah? |
Date: |
06 Jun 2004 00:47:22 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> It isn't decided yet. Probably we will hire short-term contractors
> for some of them, look for volunteers for some, and some we won't do
> unless a volunteer takes the initiative.
There are a couple of pieces missing from the puzzle:
1) Who makes technical decisions about Savannah, and what is the
process to make them?
In other words, who is the "Savannah Architect"?
That person (or group of persons) should:
- decide when, how and what features to implement/enable.
- coordinate the work of all the people you mentioned
(i.e. volunteers, contractors, staff, etc.) in regards to
Savannah. Ok, this mixes architecture with management, but for
this case I think it is no big deal.
- work with FSF sysadmin staff to fit Savannah into FSF IT
infrastructure's guidelines.
2) Will Savannah run 'savane', GForge, or ?
This is important (among other reasons) to be able to choose the
skill set for the volunteers and contractors.
Actually, I would expect this answer from the Architect(s).
> As far as I know, Savannah is already nearly 'back to normal'; that
> list consists of additional work we would like to do to improve
> matters.
I definitely disagree, Savannah is not nearly 'back to normal', there
are still important issues to be resolved, besides the one I described
above, Elfyn described others in his email.
Greetings,
- --
Hugo Gayosso
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAwqHaMNObVRBZveYRAruAAJ4qtR0/5bTA6V5qk7Ap7Y86b40wNgCfU8Bt
LdPnITtRVt1UEC2l8ACW3iQ=
=Dvuj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----