|
From: | Anoop John |
Subject: | [Savannah-register-public] [task #9014] Submission of gPHPEdit |
Date: | Tue, 20 Jan 2009 21:40:56 +0000 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008121621 Ubuntu/8.04 (hardy) Firefox/3.0.5 |
Follow-up Comment #7, task #9014 (project administration): I checked out the list thread. It looks like you are discussing about the binary which I have already taken out from the source tarball. Please download the latest tarball from http://www.gphpedit.org/sites/default/files/gphpedit-0.9.91-5.tar.gz My comment #4 lists the existing issues outside of the scintilla directory - each of the issue have corresponding to them my questions related to them. Then in comment #5, if the answer to the question posted is in the affirmative then I can include the scintilla directory without problems but if not then I might have to exclude the scintilla directory from the source which should again not be a big issue. I am pursuing this issue at the scintilla issue queue but there the general feel I get is that the whole package is under a BSD like license and that if the notice is missing it should just be assumed that the file is under the same Scintilla license. Thank you for your patience in reviewing the code in detail and helping in sorting this issue out _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <http://savannah.gnu.org/task/?9014> _______________________________________________ Message sent via/by Savannah http://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |